The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck

Objective: The MACS facelift alone shows poor results on the medial neck in cases of pronounced, rigid platysmabands (McKinney III–IV°). The original MACS (“Minimal Access Cranial Suspension”) facelift delirs excellent results on the midface and leads to sustainably improved outcome on the neck by a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaye, Kai O., Sattler, Daniel R.
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014-12-01
Series:GMS German Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery – Burn and Hand Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/gpras/2014-4/gpras000028.shtml
_version_ 1818205114227228672
author Kaye, Kai O.
Sattler, Daniel R.
author_facet Kaye, Kai O.
Sattler, Daniel R.
author_sort Kaye, Kai O.
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The MACS facelift alone shows poor results on the medial neck in cases of pronounced, rigid platysmabands (McKinney III–IV°). The original MACS (“Minimal Access Cranial Suspension”) facelift delirs excellent results on the midface and leads to sustainably improved outcome on the neck by adding a fourth suture on the platysma. McKinney type I–II platysmabands can be treated only by lateral approach of the ‘fourth suture’, type III–IV should be treated with closed platysma myotomy before.Methods: Between October 2007 and November 2013 a number of 219 patients were treated with the MACS facelift technique accomplished by a fourth suture on the platysma and liposuction or optional lipectomy on the neck. On 47 patients closed transcutaneous platysma myotomy was performed.Results: Surgery time lasted on average 2.5 hours and was performed under sedation with local anesthesia in 85%. Recovery time ranged between 14 to 16 days until the patients were back to work. Due to their health status 54% of our patients had an inpatient arrangement for one night and 46% an outpatient arrangement.Conclusion: The modification of the MACS lift with the ‘fourth suture’ on the platysma keeps the benefits of the original technique but improves the aesthetic outcome on the neck.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:51:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3e420410b9f4f00a0565e178f3cc45a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-7052
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:51:59Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format Article
series GMS German Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery – Burn and Hand Surgery
spelling doaj.art-c3e420410b9f4f00a0565e178f3cc45a2022-12-22T00:39:22ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS German Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery – Burn and Hand Surgery2193-70522014-12-014Doc0910.3205/gpras000028The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neckKaye, Kai O.0Sattler, Daniel R.1Oceanclinic, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Marbella, SpainUniversity Hospital Magdeburg, Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Handsurgery, Magdeburg, GermanyObjective: The MACS facelift alone shows poor results on the medial neck in cases of pronounced, rigid platysmabands (McKinney III–IV°). The original MACS (“Minimal Access Cranial Suspension”) facelift delirs excellent results on the midface and leads to sustainably improved outcome on the neck by adding a fourth suture on the platysma. McKinney type I–II platysmabands can be treated only by lateral approach of the ‘fourth suture’, type III–IV should be treated with closed platysma myotomy before.Methods: Between October 2007 and November 2013 a number of 219 patients were treated with the MACS facelift technique accomplished by a fourth suture on the platysma and liposuction or optional lipectomy on the neck. On 47 patients closed transcutaneous platysma myotomy was performed.Results: Surgery time lasted on average 2.5 hours and was performed under sedation with local anesthesia in 85%. Recovery time ranged between 14 to 16 days until the patients were back to work. Due to their health status 54% of our patients had an inpatient arrangement for one night and 46% an outpatient arrangement.Conclusion: The modification of the MACS lift with the ‘fourth suture’ on the platysma keeps the benefits of the original technique but improves the aesthetic outcome on the neck.http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/gpras/2014-4/gpras000028.shtmlMACS liftface liftneck liftfourth sutureplatysma myotomy
spellingShingle Kaye, Kai O.
Sattler, Daniel R.
The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
GMS German Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery – Burn and Hand Surgery
MACS lift
face lift
neck lift
fourth suture
platysma myotomy
title The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
title_full The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
title_fullStr The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
title_full_unstemmed The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
title_short The fourth suture in MACS facelifting – adressing the neck
title_sort fourth suture in macs facelifting adressing the neck
topic MACS lift
face lift
neck lift
fourth suture
platysma myotomy
url http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/gpras/2014-4/gpras000028.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT kayekaio thefourthsutureinmacsfaceliftingadressingtheneck
AT sattlerdanielr thefourthsutureinmacsfaceliftingadressingtheneck
AT kayekaio fourthsutureinmacsfaceliftingadressingtheneck
AT sattlerdanielr fourthsutureinmacsfaceliftingadressingtheneck