Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View

Introduction: The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship of working memory capacity with the use of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, cognitive flexibility level, and learning styles of university students. Methods: In the present study (N = 39), the participants completed the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kahraman Guler, Aylin Aydin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2022-11-01
Series:Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/526226
_version_ 1828091327020007424
author Kahraman Guler
Aylin Aydin
author_facet Kahraman Guler
Aylin Aydin
author_sort Kahraman Guler
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship of working memory capacity with the use of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, cognitive flexibility level, and learning styles of university students. Methods: In the present study (N = 39), the participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, and Vermunt Learning Styles Inventory and three WM capacity (WMC) tasks that are Rotation Span Task, Operation Span Task, and Symmetry Span Task. Their WMCs were assessed, and the relationship of it was compared with cognitive emotion regulation, cognitive flexibility, and learning styles. Results: The results indicated that there is a significant difference and negative correlation (r= −0.341) between Operation Span Task and refocus on planning. Findings of the research indicated correlations between emotion regulation strategies and between cognitive flexibility and two emotion regulation strategies that are refocus on planning (r = 0.528) and positive reappraisal (r = 0.574). Only one learning style that is Processing Strategies in Vermunt Learning Style Inventory was found significantly different in terms of the cognitive flexibility level of the participants. The results also indicated a positive correlation between verbal and spatial WM tasks which support the domain general view for WMC. Conclusions: Further studies are advised to be conducted between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and working memory capacity as these findings may have significant implications for understanding the correlation between memory and emotion.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:11:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3f3a280a7c044bcbf887a7998174b10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-5464
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:11:13Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Karger Publishers
record_format Article
series Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
spelling doaj.art-c3f3a280a7c044bcbf887a7998174b102022-12-22T04:41:17ZengKarger PublishersDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra1664-54642022-11-0112313114910.1159/000526226526226Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General ViewKahraman Guler0Aylin Aydin1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-3844Psychology, Faculty of Science and Literature, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, TurkeyApplied English and Translation, Vocational School, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, TurkeyIntroduction: The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship of working memory capacity with the use of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, cognitive flexibility level, and learning styles of university students. Methods: In the present study (N = 39), the participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, and Vermunt Learning Styles Inventory and three WM capacity (WMC) tasks that are Rotation Span Task, Operation Span Task, and Symmetry Span Task. Their WMCs were assessed, and the relationship of it was compared with cognitive emotion regulation, cognitive flexibility, and learning styles. Results: The results indicated that there is a significant difference and negative correlation (r= −0.341) between Operation Span Task and refocus on planning. Findings of the research indicated correlations between emotion regulation strategies and between cognitive flexibility and two emotion regulation strategies that are refocus on planning (r = 0.528) and positive reappraisal (r = 0.574). Only one learning style that is Processing Strategies in Vermunt Learning Style Inventory was found significantly different in terms of the cognitive flexibility level of the participants. The results also indicated a positive correlation between verbal and spatial WM tasks which support the domain general view for WMC. Conclusions: Further studies are advised to be conducted between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and working memory capacity as these findings may have significant implications for understanding the correlation between memory and emotion.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/526226working memory capacitycognitive emotion regulationcognitive flexibilitylearning styles
spellingShingle Kahraman Guler
Aylin Aydin
Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
working memory capacity
cognitive emotion regulation
cognitive flexibility
learning styles
title Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
title_full Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
title_fullStr Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
title_short Comparing the Working Memory Capacity with Cognitive Flexibility, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and Learning Styles of University Students: A Domain General View
title_sort comparing the working memory capacity with cognitive flexibility cognitive emotion regulation and learning styles of university students a domain general view
topic working memory capacity
cognitive emotion regulation
cognitive flexibility
learning styles
url https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/526226
work_keys_str_mv AT kahramanguler comparingtheworkingmemorycapacitywithcognitiveflexibilitycognitiveemotionregulationandlearningstylesofuniversitystudentsadomaingeneralview
AT aylinaydin comparingtheworkingmemorycapacitywithcognitiveflexibilitycognitiveemotionregulationandlearningstylesofuniversitystudentsadomaingeneralview