Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy and gonadotropin therapy (GT) were widely used for male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), but their efficacy was not well compared before. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of restori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao Wei, Gongwei Long, Yucong Zhang, Tao Wang, Shaogang Wang, Jihong Liu, Delin Ma, Xiaming Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology 2021-10-01
Series:The World Journal of Men's Health
Subjects:
_version_ 1818882391302733824
author Chao Wei
Gongwei Long
Yucong Zhang
Tao Wang
Shaogang Wang
Jihong Liu
Delin Ma
Xiaming Liu
author_facet Chao Wei
Gongwei Long
Yucong Zhang
Tao Wang
Shaogang Wang
Jihong Liu
Delin Ma
Xiaming Liu
author_sort Chao Wei
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy and gonadotropin therapy (GT) were widely used for male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), but their efficacy was not well compared before. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of restoring fertility using these two therapies. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for comparative studies evaluating the efficiency of GnRH therapy and GT for male patients with CHH. For continuous outcomes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to measure the difference, whereas the risk ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated for binary variables. Results: Overall, eight articles from seven studies with 420 patients enrolled were included in the analysis. Patients from the two different groups were determined to be comparable in age, proportion with Kallmann syndrome, percentage of cryptorchidism and pretreatment hormones (follicular-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone). GnRH therapy was related to a larger testicular volume (standardized mean difference=-1.43; p=0.01) and earlier spermatogenesis (WMD=- 5.30 months; p=0.004) compared to GT. However, the difference in the rate of positive sperm detection (p=0.08), sperm concentration (p=0.37), and pregnancy rate (p=0.11) were not significant. Allergic reactions mostly occurred during GnRH therapy, while GT was related to a higher incidence of gynecomastia and acne. Conclusions: Compared to GT, GnRH was related to earlier spermatogenesis and less estradiol-related adverse reactions, although there were no significant differences in spermatogenesis rate, sperm concentration, and pregnancy rate. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for future research.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T15:17:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3f4bd84a1184255b8131f13df43c683
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-4208
2287-4690
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T15:17:01Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology
record_format Article
series The World Journal of Men's Health
spelling doaj.art-c3f4bd84a1184255b8131f13df43c6832022-12-21T20:16:07ZengKorean Society for Sexual Medicine and AndrologyThe World Journal of Men's Health2287-42082287-46902021-10-0139465466510.5534/wjmh.200043Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisChao Wei0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-5030Gongwei Long1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-2306Yucong Zhang2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-5066Tao Wang3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-4913Shaogang Wang4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-4303Jihong Liu5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-9734Delin Ma6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0860-0129Xiaming Liu7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-8791Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaPurpose: Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy and gonadotropin therapy (GT) were widely used for male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), but their efficacy was not well compared before. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of restoring fertility using these two therapies. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for comparative studies evaluating the efficiency of GnRH therapy and GT for male patients with CHH. For continuous outcomes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to measure the difference, whereas the risk ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated for binary variables. Results: Overall, eight articles from seven studies with 420 patients enrolled were included in the analysis. Patients from the two different groups were determined to be comparable in age, proportion with Kallmann syndrome, percentage of cryptorchidism and pretreatment hormones (follicular-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone). GnRH therapy was related to a larger testicular volume (standardized mean difference=-1.43; p=0.01) and earlier spermatogenesis (WMD=- 5.30 months; p=0.004) compared to GT. However, the difference in the rate of positive sperm detection (p=0.08), sperm concentration (p=0.37), and pregnancy rate (p=0.11) were not significant. Allergic reactions mostly occurred during GnRH therapy, while GT was related to a higher incidence of gynecomastia and acne. Conclusions: Compared to GT, GnRH was related to earlier spermatogenesis and less estradiol-related adverse reactions, although there were no significant differences in spermatogenesis rate, sperm concentration, and pregnancy rate. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for future research.chorionic gonadotropingonadotropin-releasing hormoneidiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadismkallmann syndromespermatogenesis
spellingShingle Chao Wei
Gongwei Long
Yucong Zhang
Tao Wang
Shaogang Wang
Jihong Liu
Delin Ma
Xiaming Liu
Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The World Journal of Men's Health
chorionic gonadotropin
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
kallmann syndrome
spermatogenesis
title Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Spermatogenesis of Male Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Receiving Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Versus Gonadotropin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort spermatogenesis of male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism receiving pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy versus gonadotropin therapy a systematic review and meta analysis
topic chorionic gonadotropin
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
kallmann syndrome
spermatogenesis
work_keys_str_mv AT chaowei spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gongweilong spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yucongzhang spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taowang spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaogangwang spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jihongliu spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT delinma spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiamingliu spermatogenesisofmalepatientswithcongenitalhypogonadotropichypogonadismreceivingpulsatilegonadotropinreleasinghormonetherapyversusgonadotropintherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis