Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty

Abstract Objective: To illustrate how regional variation in data quality could explain some or all of the apparent regional differences in the health status of Indigenous Australians. Methods: A series of simple hypothetical numerical examples is provided, with varying assumptions regarding the accu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joan Cunningham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2002-12-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00355.x
_version_ 1797725428495941632
author Joan Cunningham
author_facet Joan Cunningham
author_sort Joan Cunningham
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: To illustrate how regional variation in data quality could explain some or all of the apparent regional differences in the health status of Indigenous Australians. Methods: A series of simple hypothetical numerical examples is provided, with varying assumptions regarding the accuracy of identification of Indigenous deaths. Results: The apparent difference in Indigenous mortality in remote compared with urban areas is of a magnitude that could be explained by relatively modest regional differences in data quality. Conclusion and implications: Determinations of relative health status within the Indigenous population must take into account the impact of variability in data quality. Accepted: October 2002
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:31:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c3f94075ba094b8998292a62ab4d81f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:31:05Z
publishDate 2002-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-c3f94075ba094b8998292a62ab4d81f22023-09-02T09:14:49ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052002-12-0126649749910.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00355.xComparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertaintyJoan Cunningham0Menzies School of Health Research, Northern TerritoryAbstract Objective: To illustrate how regional variation in data quality could explain some or all of the apparent regional differences in the health status of Indigenous Australians. Methods: A series of simple hypothetical numerical examples is provided, with varying assumptions regarding the accuracy of identification of Indigenous deaths. Results: The apparent difference in Indigenous mortality in remote compared with urban areas is of a magnitude that could be explained by relatively modest regional differences in data quality. Conclusion and implications: Determinations of relative health status within the Indigenous population must take into account the impact of variability in data quality. Accepted: October 2002https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00355.x
spellingShingle Joan Cunningham
Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
title Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
title_full Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
title_fullStr Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
title_short Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertainty
title_sort comparing indigenous health status across regions a numerical example of uncertainty
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00355.x
work_keys_str_mv AT joancunningham comparingindigenoushealthstatusacrossregionsanumericalexampleofuncertainty