The First Half of the Trascendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B)

After the publication of Strawson’s “The Bounds of Sense”, the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has been widely regarded as a proof of the objectivity of knowledge as a condition of unity of self-consciousness. Nevertheless, many interpreters accept that there are passages...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hirotaka Nakano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2008-08-01
Series:Ideas y Valores
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ideasyvalores.unal.edu.co/archivos/PDF137/12_nakano.pdf
Description
Summary:After the publication of Strawson’s “The Bounds of Sense”, the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has been widely regarded as a proof of the objectivity of knowledge as a condition of unity of self-consciousness. Nevertheless, many interpreters accept that there are passages which cannot be easily integrated into such a strategy. In this article, through an analysis of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction (B), I try to point out the need to adopt a different interpretation according to which Kant does not consider objectivity as a condition of self-consciousness, but rather self-consciousness as a necessary condition of objectivity.
ISSN:0120-0062