Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning

Abstract Echocardiography, a simple and noninvasive tool, is the first choice for screening pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, accurate assessment of PH, incorporating both the pulmonary artery pressures and additional signs for PH remained unsatisfied. Thus, this study aimed to develop a machine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zuwei Liao, Kaikai Liu, Shangwei Ding, Qinhua Zhao, Yong Jiang, Lan Wang, Taoran Huang, LiFang Yang, Dongling Luo, Erlei Zhang, Yu Zhang, Caojin Zhang, Xiaowei Xu, Hongwen Fei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12272
_version_ 1797672378777468928
author Zuwei Liao
Kaikai Liu
Shangwei Ding
Qinhua Zhao
Yong Jiang
Lan Wang
Taoran Huang
LiFang Yang
Dongling Luo
Erlei Zhang
Yu Zhang
Caojin Zhang
Xiaowei Xu
Hongwen Fei
author_facet Zuwei Liao
Kaikai Liu
Shangwei Ding
Qinhua Zhao
Yong Jiang
Lan Wang
Taoran Huang
LiFang Yang
Dongling Luo
Erlei Zhang
Yu Zhang
Caojin Zhang
Xiaowei Xu
Hongwen Fei
author_sort Zuwei Liao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Echocardiography, a simple and noninvasive tool, is the first choice for screening pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, accurate assessment of PH, incorporating both the pulmonary artery pressures and additional signs for PH remained unsatisfied. Thus, this study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that can automatically evaluate the probability of PH. This cohort included data from 346 (275 for training set and internal validation set and 71 for external validation set) patients with suspected PH patients and receiving right heart catheterization. Echocardiographic images on parasternal short axis‐papillary muscle level (PSAX‐PML) view from all patients were collected, labeled, and preprocessed. Local features from each image were extracted and subsequently integrated to build a ML model. By adjusting the parameters of the model, the model with the best prediction effect is finally constructed. We used receiver‐operating characteristic analysis to evaluate model performance and compared the ML model with the traditional methods. The accuracy of the ML model for diagnosis of PH was significantly higher than the traditional method (0.945 vs. 0.892, p = 0.027 [area under the curve [AUC]]). Similar findings were observed in subgroup analysis and validated in the external validation set (AUC = 0.950 [95% CI: 0.897−1.000]). In summary, ML methods could automatically extract features from traditional PSAX‐PML view and automatically assess the probability of PH, which were found to outperform traditional echocardiographic assessments.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:29:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c40b43749429468586f2d1ee70ea2aea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:29:11Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-c40b43749429468586f2d1ee70ea2aea2023-09-27T13:33:25ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402023-07-01133n/an/a10.1002/pul2.12272Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learningZuwei Liao0Kaikai Liu1Shangwei Ding2Qinhua Zhao3Yong Jiang4Lan Wang5Taoran Huang6LiFang Yang7Dongling Luo8Erlei Zhang9Yu Zhang10Caojin Zhang11Xiaowei Xu12Hongwen Fei13Shantou University Medical College Shantou Guangdong ChinaSchool of Information Engineering Northwest A&F University Yangling Shanxi ChinaDepartment of Ultrasound The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong ChinaDepartment of Pulmonary Circulation Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Echocardiography National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing ChinaDepartment of Pulmonary Circulation Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaShantou University Medical College Shantou Guangdong ChinaGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong ChinaGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong ChinaSchool of Information Engineering Northwest A&F University Yangling Shanxi ChinaSchool of Information Engineering Northwest A&F University Yangling Shanxi ChinaGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong ChinaGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences) Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong ChinaShantou University Medical College Shantou Guangdong ChinaAbstract Echocardiography, a simple and noninvasive tool, is the first choice for screening pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, accurate assessment of PH, incorporating both the pulmonary artery pressures and additional signs for PH remained unsatisfied. Thus, this study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that can automatically evaluate the probability of PH. This cohort included data from 346 (275 for training set and internal validation set and 71 for external validation set) patients with suspected PH patients and receiving right heart catheterization. Echocardiographic images on parasternal short axis‐papillary muscle level (PSAX‐PML) view from all patients were collected, labeled, and preprocessed. Local features from each image were extracted and subsequently integrated to build a ML model. By adjusting the parameters of the model, the model with the best prediction effect is finally constructed. We used receiver‐operating characteristic analysis to evaluate model performance and compared the ML model with the traditional methods. The accuracy of the ML model for diagnosis of PH was significantly higher than the traditional method (0.945 vs. 0.892, p = 0.027 [area under the curve [AUC]]). Similar findings were observed in subgroup analysis and validated in the external validation set (AUC = 0.950 [95% CI: 0.897−1.000]). In summary, ML methods could automatically extract features from traditional PSAX‐PML view and automatically assess the probability of PH, which were found to outperform traditional echocardiographic assessments.https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12272echocardiographymachine learningmean pulmonary artery pressurepulmonary hypertension
spellingShingle Zuwei Liao
Kaikai Liu
Shangwei Ding
Qinhua Zhao
Yong Jiang
Lan Wang
Taoran Huang
LiFang Yang
Dongling Luo
Erlei Zhang
Yu Zhang
Caojin Zhang
Xiaowei Xu
Hongwen Fei
Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
Pulmonary Circulation
echocardiography
machine learning
mean pulmonary artery pressure
pulmonary hypertension
title Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
title_full Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
title_fullStr Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
title_short Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
title_sort automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning
topic echocardiography
machine learning
mean pulmonary artery pressure
pulmonary hypertension
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12272
work_keys_str_mv AT zuweiliao automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT kaikailiu automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT shangweiding automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT qinhuazhao automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT yongjiang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT lanwang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT taoranhuang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT lifangyang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT donglingluo automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT erleizhang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT yuzhang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT caojinzhang automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT xiaoweixu automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning
AT hongwenfei automaticechocardiographicevaluationoftheprobabilityofpulmonaryhypertensionusingmachinelearning