Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.

There is a long history of experiments in which participants are instructed to generate a long sequence of binary random numbers. The scope of this line of research has shifted over the years from identifying the basic psychological principles and/or the heuristics that lead to deviations from rando...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanan Shteingart, Yonatan Loewenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990341?pdf=render
_version_ 1818013940202864640
author Hanan Shteingart
Yonatan Loewenstein
author_facet Hanan Shteingart
Yonatan Loewenstein
author_sort Hanan Shteingart
collection DOAJ
description There is a long history of experiments in which participants are instructed to generate a long sequence of binary random numbers. The scope of this line of research has shifted over the years from identifying the basic psychological principles and/or the heuristics that lead to deviations from randomness, to one of predicting future choices. In this paper, we used generalized linear regression and the framework of Reinforcement Learning in order to address both points. In particular, we used logistic regression analysis in order to characterize the temporal sequence of participants' choices. Surprisingly, a population analysis indicated that the contribution of the most recent trial has only a weak effect on behavior, compared to more preceding trials, a result that seems irreconcilable with standard sequential effects that decay monotonously with the delay. However, when considering each participant separately, we found that the magnitudes of the sequential effect are a monotonous decreasing function of the delay, yet these individual sequential effects are largely averaged out in a population analysis because of heterogeneity. The substantial behavioral heterogeneity in this task is further demonstrated quantitatively by considering the predictive power of the model. We show that a heterogeneous model of sequential dependencies captures the structure available in random sequence generation. Finally, we show that the results of the logistic regression analysis can be interpreted in the framework of reinforcement learning, allowing us to compare the sequential effects in the random sequence generation task to those in an operant learning task. We show that in contrast to the random sequence generation task, sequential effects in operant learning are far more homogenous across the population. These results suggest that in the random sequence generation task, different participants adopt different cognitive strategies to suppress sequential dependencies when generating the "random" sequences.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:39:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4397a7cc121407eb57222d63b67f7c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:39:29Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-c4397a7cc121407eb57222d63b67f7c72022-12-22T02:07:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01118e015764310.1371/journal.pone.0157643Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.Hanan ShteingartYonatan LoewensteinThere is a long history of experiments in which participants are instructed to generate a long sequence of binary random numbers. The scope of this line of research has shifted over the years from identifying the basic psychological principles and/or the heuristics that lead to deviations from randomness, to one of predicting future choices. In this paper, we used generalized linear regression and the framework of Reinforcement Learning in order to address both points. In particular, we used logistic regression analysis in order to characterize the temporal sequence of participants' choices. Surprisingly, a population analysis indicated that the contribution of the most recent trial has only a weak effect on behavior, compared to more preceding trials, a result that seems irreconcilable with standard sequential effects that decay monotonously with the delay. However, when considering each participant separately, we found that the magnitudes of the sequential effect are a monotonous decreasing function of the delay, yet these individual sequential effects are largely averaged out in a population analysis because of heterogeneity. The substantial behavioral heterogeneity in this task is further demonstrated quantitatively by considering the predictive power of the model. We show that a heterogeneous model of sequential dependencies captures the structure available in random sequence generation. Finally, we show that the results of the logistic regression analysis can be interpreted in the framework of reinforcement learning, allowing us to compare the sequential effects in the random sequence generation task to those in an operant learning task. We show that in contrast to the random sequence generation task, sequential effects in operant learning are far more homogenous across the population. These results suggest that in the random sequence generation task, different participants adopt different cognitive strategies to suppress sequential dependencies when generating the "random" sequences.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990341?pdf=render
spellingShingle Hanan Shteingart
Yonatan Loewenstein
Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
PLoS ONE
title Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
title_full Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
title_fullStr Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
title_short Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.
title_sort heterogeneous suppression of sequential effects in random sequence generation but not in operant learning
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990341?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hananshteingart heterogeneoussuppressionofsequentialeffectsinrandomsequencegenerationbutnotinoperantlearning
AT yonatanloewenstein heterogeneoussuppressionofsequentialeffectsinrandomsequencegenerationbutnotinoperantlearning