The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case

Background and challenges to implementation Tobacco industry (TI) interference is one of the key challenges to the creation and implementation of tobacco-reduction regulation. It continues to undermine control efforts globally. One example is the Brazilian proposal to ban additives in 2012. Recent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diogo Alves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2018-03-01
Series:Tobacco Induced Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/The-right-of-governments-to-enact-public-health-laws-the-Brazilian-tobacco-additives,84598,0,2.html
_version_ 1819024409221922816
author Diogo Alves
author_facet Diogo Alves
author_sort Diogo Alves
collection DOAJ
description Background and challenges to implementation Tobacco industry (TI) interference is one of the key challenges to the creation and implementation of tobacco-reduction regulation. It continues to undermine control efforts globally. One example is the Brazilian proposal to ban additives in 2012. Recent files show how a Dutch tobacco industry were planning to bring the case to World Trade Organization (WTO) and block the Mercosur - European Union Free Trade Agreement negations. Intervention or response Bring awareness of how articulated the TI is, ahead of many Governments. Use the Brazilian case to show how a Cigar Company based in Netherland was planning to convince/lobby other European Governments to prosecute Brazil internationally. Explore the TI library, held by the University of California in San Francisco. Display the WTO fulfilled forms they pretend to use, the exchange of documents between tobacco industry CEOs and how they were planning undermine FTA negations. Results and lessons learnt The Netherlands are the biggest exporter of tobacco to Brazil, in particular of cigars. Together, Belgium and Netherlands imports 22% of all Brazilian tobacco. There is evidence of the close relation between tobacco industry and former Dutch Interior Minister. The TI did not followed with the process because meanwhile, the Brazilian resolution was pledged in Supreme Court, where it remains. The focus swift to Australia and they used all previous legal basis, prepared to suit Brazil, in the Australian case. Conclusions and key recommendations In response to these claims from the TI, Governments may rely on their sovereign right to regulate in the interests of public health. Specifically in relation to tobacco control measures, which aim is to protect human health.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:54:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c440387ff4b444048866c50839271975
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1617-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:54:19Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher European Publishing
record_format Article
series Tobacco Induced Diseases
spelling doaj.art-c440387ff4b444048866c508392719752022-12-21T19:15:24ZengEuropean PublishingTobacco Induced Diseases1617-96252018-03-0116110.18332/tid/8459884598The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban caseDiogo Alves0Ministry of Heath of Brazil, BrazilBackground and challenges to implementation Tobacco industry (TI) interference is one of the key challenges to the creation and implementation of tobacco-reduction regulation. It continues to undermine control efforts globally. One example is the Brazilian proposal to ban additives in 2012. Recent files show how a Dutch tobacco industry were planning to bring the case to World Trade Organization (WTO) and block the Mercosur - European Union Free Trade Agreement negations. Intervention or response Bring awareness of how articulated the TI is, ahead of many Governments. Use the Brazilian case to show how a Cigar Company based in Netherland was planning to convince/lobby other European Governments to prosecute Brazil internationally. Explore the TI library, held by the University of California in San Francisco. Display the WTO fulfilled forms they pretend to use, the exchange of documents between tobacco industry CEOs and how they were planning undermine FTA negations. Results and lessons learnt The Netherlands are the biggest exporter of tobacco to Brazil, in particular of cigars. Together, Belgium and Netherlands imports 22% of all Brazilian tobacco. There is evidence of the close relation between tobacco industry and former Dutch Interior Minister. The TI did not followed with the process because meanwhile, the Brazilian resolution was pledged in Supreme Court, where it remains. The focus swift to Australia and they used all previous legal basis, prepared to suit Brazil, in the Australian case. Conclusions and key recommendations In response to these claims from the TI, Governments may rely on their sovereign right to regulate in the interests of public health. Specifically in relation to tobacco control measures, which aim is to protect human health.http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/The-right-of-governments-to-enact-public-health-laws-the-Brazilian-tobacco-additives,84598,0,2.htmlWCTOH
spellingShingle Diogo Alves
The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
Tobacco Induced Diseases
WCTOH
title The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
title_full The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
title_fullStr The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
title_full_unstemmed The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
title_short The right of governments to enact public health laws - the Brazilian tobacco additives ban case
title_sort right of governments to enact public health laws the brazilian tobacco additives ban case
topic WCTOH
url http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/The-right-of-governments-to-enact-public-health-laws-the-Brazilian-tobacco-additives,84598,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT diogoalves therightofgovernmentstoenactpublichealthlawsthebraziliantobaccoadditivesbancase
AT diogoalves rightofgovernmentstoenactpublichealthlawsthebraziliantobaccoadditivesbancase