On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes

The concept of soundscapes according to ISO 12913-1/-2/-3 proposes a descriptive framework based on a triangulation between the entities acoustic environment, person and context. While research on the person-related dimensions is well established, there is not yet complete agreement on the relevant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bergner Jakob, Peissig Jürgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2022-01-01
Series:Acta Acustica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta-acustica.edpsciences.org/articles/aacus/full_html/2022/01/aacus220055/aacus220055.html
_version_ 1797758325136293888
author Bergner Jakob
Peissig Jürgen
author_facet Bergner Jakob
Peissig Jürgen
author_sort Bergner Jakob
collection DOAJ
description The concept of soundscapes according to ISO 12913-1/-2/-3 proposes a descriptive framework based on a triangulation between the entities acoustic environment, person and context. While research on the person-related dimensions is well established, there is not yet complete agreement on the relevant indicators and dimensions for the pure description of acoustic environments. Therefore, this work attempts to identify acoustic dimensions that actually vary between different acoustic environments and thus can be used to characterize them. To this end, an exploratory, data-based approach was taken. A database of Ambisonics soundscape recordings (approx. 12.5 h) was first analyzed using a variety of signal-based acoustic indicators (Ni = 326) within the categories loudness, quality, spaciousness and time. Multivariate statistical methods were then applied to identify compound and interpretable acoustic dimensions. The interpretation of the results reveals 8 independent dimensions “Loudness”, “Directivity”, “Timbre”, “High-Frequency Timbre”, “Dynamic Range”, “High-Frequency Amplitude Modulation”, “Loudness Progression” and “Mid-High-Frequency Amplitude Modulation” to be statistically relevant. These derived latent acoustic dimensions explain 48.76% of the observed total variance and form a physical basis for the description of acoustic environments. Although all baseline indicators were selected for perceptual reasons, validation must be done through appropriate listening tests in future.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:28:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c45a08318bff4820893a30fc6d64992d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2681-4617
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:28:23Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series Acta Acustica
spelling doaj.art-c45a08318bff4820893a30fc6d64992d2023-08-02T08:27:13ZengEDP SciencesActa Acustica2681-46172022-01-0164610.1051/aacus/2022042aacus220055On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapesBergner Jakob0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-0019Peissig Jürgenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4649-8911Institute of Communications Technology, Leibniz University HannoverThe concept of soundscapes according to ISO 12913-1/-2/-3 proposes a descriptive framework based on a triangulation between the entities acoustic environment, person and context. While research on the person-related dimensions is well established, there is not yet complete agreement on the relevant indicators and dimensions for the pure description of acoustic environments. Therefore, this work attempts to identify acoustic dimensions that actually vary between different acoustic environments and thus can be used to characterize them. To this end, an exploratory, data-based approach was taken. A database of Ambisonics soundscape recordings (approx. 12.5 h) was first analyzed using a variety of signal-based acoustic indicators (Ni = 326) within the categories loudness, quality, spaciousness and time. Multivariate statistical methods were then applied to identify compound and interpretable acoustic dimensions. The interpretation of the results reveals 8 independent dimensions “Loudness”, “Directivity”, “Timbre”, “High-Frequency Timbre”, “Dynamic Range”, “High-Frequency Amplitude Modulation”, “Loudness Progression” and “Mid-High-Frequency Amplitude Modulation” to be statistically relevant. These derived latent acoustic dimensions explain 48.76% of the observed total variance and form a physical basis for the description of acoustic environments. Although all baseline indicators were selected for perceptual reasons, validation must be done through appropriate listening tests in future.https://acta-acustica.edpsciences.org/articles/aacus/full_html/2022/01/aacus220055/aacus220055.htmlsoundscapeunderlying acoustic dimensionsstatistical signal processingmultivariate statistics
spellingShingle Bergner Jakob
Peissig Jürgen
On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
Acta Acustica
soundscape
underlying acoustic dimensions
statistical signal processing
multivariate statistics
title On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
title_full On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
title_fullStr On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
title_full_unstemmed On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
title_short On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
title_sort on the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes
topic soundscape
underlying acoustic dimensions
statistical signal processing
multivariate statistics
url https://acta-acustica.edpsciences.org/articles/aacus/full_html/2022/01/aacus220055/aacus220055.html
work_keys_str_mv AT bergnerjakob ontheidentificationandassessmentofunderlyingacousticdimensionsofsoundscapes
AT peissigjurgen ontheidentificationandassessmentofunderlyingacousticdimensionsofsoundscapes