Defining far transfer via thematic similarity
One of the most valuable functions of philosophy within the cognitive sciences and education is to help clarify important concepts, and the transfer of learning—particularly far transfer—is one such concept needing extra clarification. This is for two reasons. First, determining the psychological di...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1523348 |
| _version_ | 1818610931683295232 |
|---|---|
| author | Benjamin Robert Forsyth |
| author_facet | Benjamin Robert Forsyth |
| author_sort | Benjamin Robert Forsyth |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | One of the most valuable functions of philosophy within the cognitive sciences and education is to help clarify important concepts, and the transfer of learning—particularly far transfer—is one such concept needing extra clarification. This is for two reasons. First, determining the psychological distance of transfer is a subjective matter depending on how similar the base and target are proposed to be which makes labeling instances of far transfer difficult. Second, current theoretical mechanisms of transfer, based on analogical reasoning structure mapping theories, struggle to explain instances of far transfer because of their commitment to structural similarity. This paper addresses these two issues by proposing an additional level of similarity—called thematic similarity—that people may use when engaging in transfer. Based on the philosophical ideas of Stephen Pepper and Gerald Holton, similarity at the thematic level is distinguished from other previously theorized levels of similarity in that it is prefigurative rather than structural. Furthermore, transfer is defined as near or far depending on the type of similarity that is involved in the transfer process rather than according to the total amount of similarity between the target and base. The paper concludes with a discussion regarding the empirical testability of these ideas. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T15:22:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c45c1e1f1f6247e3a5b4cf49605e26b0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2331-1908 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T15:22:17Z |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-c45c1e1f1f6247e3a5b4cf49605e26b02022-12-21T22:26:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Psychology2331-19082018-12-015110.1080/23311908.2018.15233481523348Defining far transfer via thematic similarityBenjamin Robert Forsyth0University of Northern IowaOne of the most valuable functions of philosophy within the cognitive sciences and education is to help clarify important concepts, and the transfer of learning—particularly far transfer—is one such concept needing extra clarification. This is for two reasons. First, determining the psychological distance of transfer is a subjective matter depending on how similar the base and target are proposed to be which makes labeling instances of far transfer difficult. Second, current theoretical mechanisms of transfer, based on analogical reasoning structure mapping theories, struggle to explain instances of far transfer because of their commitment to structural similarity. This paper addresses these two issues by proposing an additional level of similarity—called thematic similarity—that people may use when engaging in transfer. Based on the philosophical ideas of Stephen Pepper and Gerald Holton, similarity at the thematic level is distinguished from other previously theorized levels of similarity in that it is prefigurative rather than structural. Furthermore, transfer is defined as near or far depending on the type of similarity that is involved in the transfer process rather than according to the total amount of similarity between the target and base. The paper concludes with a discussion regarding the empirical testability of these ideas.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1523348transfer of learningfar transfersimilarityanalogical reasoningepistemic beliefs |
| spellingShingle | Benjamin Robert Forsyth Defining far transfer via thematic similarity Cogent Psychology transfer of learning far transfer similarity analogical reasoning epistemic beliefs |
| title | Defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| title_full | Defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| title_fullStr | Defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| title_short | Defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| title_sort | defining far transfer via thematic similarity |
| topic | transfer of learning far transfer similarity analogical reasoning epistemic beliefs |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1523348 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminrobertforsyth definingfartransferviathematicsimilarity |