Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832 |
_version_ | 1811194646186950656 |
---|---|
author | Trudy Govier |
author_facet | Trudy Govier |
author_sort | Trudy Govier |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive argument, Harald Wohlrapp later concluded that my treatments were seriously flawed and that an alternative approach can serve to replace that problematic and much contested conception. Much of the difference between our approaches concerns what he deems to be a logicistic approach (referred to here as logicism) on my part. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:30:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c465becb296f40b4a320c16c75a50869 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0824-2577 0824-2577 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:30:15Z |
publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
publisher | University of Windsor |
record_format | Article |
series | Informal Logic |
spelling | doaj.art-c465becb296f40b4a320c16c75a508692022-12-22T03:55:22ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25770824-25772017-09-0137321122210.22329/il.v37i3.48323798Issues of Logicism and ObjectivityTrudy Govier0University of LethbridgeConcerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive argument, Harald Wohlrapp later concluded that my treatments were seriously flawed and that an alternative approach can serve to replace that problematic and much contested conception. Much of the difference between our approaches concerns what he deems to be a logicistic approach (referred to here as logicism) on my part.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832 |
spellingShingle | Trudy Govier Issues of Logicism and Objectivity Informal Logic |
title | Issues of Logicism and Objectivity |
title_full | Issues of Logicism and Objectivity |
title_fullStr | Issues of Logicism and Objectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Issues of Logicism and Objectivity |
title_short | Issues of Logicism and Objectivity |
title_sort | issues of logicism and objectivity |
url | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trudygovier issuesoflogicismandobjectivity |