Issues of Logicism and Objectivity

Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trudy Govier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2017-09-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832
_version_ 1811194646186950656
author Trudy Govier
author_facet Trudy Govier
author_sort Trudy Govier
collection DOAJ
description Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive argument, Harald Wohlrapp later concluded that my treatments were seriously flawed and that an alternative approach can serve to replace that problematic and much contested conception. Much of the difference between our approaches concerns what he deems to be a logicistic approach (referred to here as logicism) on my part.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:30:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c465becb296f40b4a320c16c75a50869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0824-2577
0824-2577
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:30:15Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj.art-c465becb296f40b4a320c16c75a508692022-12-22T03:55:22ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25770824-25772017-09-0137321122210.22329/il.v37i3.48323798Issues of Logicism and ObjectivityTrudy Govier0University of LethbridgeConcerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise. I shall concentrate here on aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation, a type of what has been called conductive argument. Though initially intrigued by my efforts to describe and explore conductive argument, Harald Wohlrapp later concluded that my treatments were seriously flawed and that an alternative approach can serve to replace that problematic and much contested conception. Much of the difference between our approaches concerns what he deems to be a logicistic approach (referred to here as logicism) on my part.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832
spellingShingle Trudy Govier
Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
Informal Logic
title Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
title_full Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
title_fullStr Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
title_full_unstemmed Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
title_short Issues of Logicism and Objectivity
title_sort issues of logicism and objectivity
url https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4832
work_keys_str_mv AT trudygovier issuesoflogicismandobjectivity