Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries

Abstract We evaluated the correlation of the left main coronary bifurcating angle (LCBA) with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the feasibility of measuring the LBCA using the axial plane. Coronary Computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Hsiang Juan, Pei-Kwei Tsay, Wei-Chih Shen, Chih-Seng Yeh, Ming-Shien Wen, Yung-Liang Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2017-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01679-3
_version_ 1818977839066644480
author Yu-Hsiang Juan
Pei-Kwei Tsay
Wei-Chih Shen
Chih-Seng Yeh
Ming-Shien Wen
Yung-Liang Wan
author_facet Yu-Hsiang Juan
Pei-Kwei Tsay
Wei-Chih Shen
Chih-Seng Yeh
Ming-Shien Wen
Yung-Liang Wan
author_sort Yu-Hsiang Juan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We evaluated the correlation of the left main coronary bifurcating angle (LCBA) with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the feasibility of measuring the LBCA using the axial plane. Coronary Computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of 313 patients between Nov. 2006 and Oct. 2013 were reviewed and separated into three groups. Group I (211 patients) had significant stenosis (≥50%) of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and/or left circumflex coronary artery (LCX). Group II (62 subjects) had atherosclerosis without significant stenosis. Group III (40 subjects) had unremarkable coronary CTAs. Both Group I and II patients received conventional catheter angiography to confirm the severities of coronary stenoses. Significant differences were found among the groups with respect to risk factors, such as male gender, hypertension and body mass index. Axial plane measurement was feasible in most patients (82.1%), without significant differences among the groups. The mean LCBA was 84.7° among all patients, and significantly differed among groups I, II and III (87.34°, 81.16° and 75.53°, P < 0.001). The LCBA of group I was significantly higher than group III (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis, but insignificant in multivariate analysis (P = 0.064).
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:34:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c468f026a9f84010888ce0f66bab7b4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:34:07Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-c468f026a9f84010888ce0f66bab7b4a2022-12-21T19:33:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222017-05-01711810.1038/s41598-017-01679-3Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary ArteriesYu-Hsiang Juan0Pei-Kwei Tsay1Wei-Chih Shen2Chih-Seng Yeh3Ming-Shien Wen4Yung-Liang Wan5Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Institute for Radiological Research, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Center of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical UniversityDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Institute for Radiological Research, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversitySection of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Institute for Radiological Research, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityAbstract We evaluated the correlation of the left main coronary bifurcating angle (LCBA) with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the feasibility of measuring the LBCA using the axial plane. Coronary Computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of 313 patients between Nov. 2006 and Oct. 2013 were reviewed and separated into three groups. Group I (211 patients) had significant stenosis (≥50%) of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and/or left circumflex coronary artery (LCX). Group II (62 subjects) had atherosclerosis without significant stenosis. Group III (40 subjects) had unremarkable coronary CTAs. Both Group I and II patients received conventional catheter angiography to confirm the severities of coronary stenoses. Significant differences were found among the groups with respect to risk factors, such as male gender, hypertension and body mass index. Axial plane measurement was feasible in most patients (82.1%), without significant differences among the groups. The mean LCBA was 84.7° among all patients, and significantly differed among groups I, II and III (87.34°, 81.16° and 75.53°, P < 0.001). The LCBA of group I was significantly higher than group III (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis, but insignificant in multivariate analysis (P = 0.064).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01679-3
spellingShingle Yu-Hsiang Juan
Pei-Kwei Tsay
Wei-Chih Shen
Chih-Seng Yeh
Ming-Shien Wen
Yung-Liang Wan
Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
title_full Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
title_fullStr Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
title_short Comparison of the Left Main Coronary Bifurcating Angle among Patients with Normal, Non-significantly and Significantly Stenosed Left Coronary Arteries
title_sort comparison of the left main coronary bifurcating angle among patients with normal non significantly and significantly stenosed left coronary arteries
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01679-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhsiangjuan comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries
AT peikweitsay comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries
AT weichihshen comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries
AT chihsengyeh comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries
AT mingshienwen comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries
AT yungliangwan comparisonoftheleftmaincoronarybifurcatingangleamongpatientswithnormalnonsignificantlyandsignificantlystenosedleftcoronaryarteries