Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research

Interviewee Transcript Review (ITR), a form of Respondent Validation, is a way to share and check interview transcripts with research participants. To date, the literature has considered how these practices affect data quality, focused on the ability of a participant to correct, add or remove data....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Rowlands
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-12-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211066170
_version_ 1819006230816882688
author James Rowlands
author_facet James Rowlands
author_sort James Rowlands
collection DOAJ
description Interviewee Transcript Review (ITR), a form of Respondent Validation, is a way to share and check interview transcripts with research participants. To date, the literature has considered how these practices affect data quality, focused on the ability of a participant to correct, add or remove data. Less considered is the extent to which ITR might enable sensitive research. Reporting on research examining the experiences and perspectives of different stakeholders involved in Domestic Homicide Reviews, 40 participants who took part in semi-structured interviews were offered the opportunity to review their transcripts. This paper contributes to the understanding of the use of ITR, demonstrating how it can be used to increase participant confidence to provide assurance about, and indeed active involvement in, the steps being taken to preserve their anonymity.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:05:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c46f75107e8846ae9f05f9d5505aa6cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1609-4069
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:05:23Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
spelling doaj.art-c46f75107e8846ae9f05f9d5505aa6cd2022-12-21T19:22:29ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692021-12-012010.1177/16094069211066170Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive ResearchJames RowlandsInterviewee Transcript Review (ITR), a form of Respondent Validation, is a way to share and check interview transcripts with research participants. To date, the literature has considered how these practices affect data quality, focused on the ability of a participant to correct, add or remove data. Less considered is the extent to which ITR might enable sensitive research. Reporting on research examining the experiences and perspectives of different stakeholders involved in Domestic Homicide Reviews, 40 participants who took part in semi-structured interviews were offered the opportunity to review their transcripts. This paper contributes to the understanding of the use of ITR, demonstrating how it can be used to increase participant confidence to provide assurance about, and indeed active involvement in, the steps being taken to preserve their anonymity.https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211066170
spellingShingle James Rowlands
Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
title Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
title_full Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
title_fullStr Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
title_full_unstemmed Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
title_short Interviewee Transcript Review as a Tool to Improve Data Quality and Participant Confidence in Sensitive Research
title_sort interviewee transcript review as a tool to improve data quality and participant confidence in sensitive research
url https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211066170
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesrowlands intervieweetranscriptreviewasatooltoimprovedataqualityandparticipantconfidenceinsensitiveresearch