A Comparison of Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Practice: Divergent Policy Practices in Sweden
This paper compares the implementation of the two economic evaluation methods Cost-Effectiveness/Utility (CEA/CUA) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) as tools for allocation of national public funds in the health and transport sector in Sweden, respectively. We compare the recommended values for import...
Main Authors: | Mikael Svensson, Lars Hultkrantz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Oslo
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Nordic Journal of Health Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.uio.no/NJHE/article/view/1592 |
Similar Items
-
Immunization against Haemophilus influenzae type b in Iran; Cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses
by: Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Alternatives to Cost-Benefit Analysis in Regulatory Decisions
by: Ashford, Nicholas A.
Published: (2002) -
Cost and Benefit Analysis of Sports Tourism in Downhill Trek, Cikole Lembang, Bandung Barat District, West Java Province
by: Hery Sigit Cahyadi, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Cost–Benefit Analysis of Associated Gas Flaring in the Niger – Delta Area of Nigeria (a case study of 1958 – 2004
by: C.F. Amaechi, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Towards a ‘smart’ cost–benefit tool: using machine learning to predict the costs of criminal justice policy interventions
by: Matthew Manning, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)