Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.

<h4>Background</h4>Abdominal ultrasonography (US) is the backbone of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Although previous studies have evaluated clinical factors related to surveillance failure, none have focused specifically on US blind spots.<h4>Methods</h4>This s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junghwan Lee, Su Bee Park, Soyoung Byun, Ha Il Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274747
_version_ 1828143050298228736
author Junghwan Lee
Su Bee Park
Soyoung Byun
Ha Il Kim
author_facet Junghwan Lee
Su Bee Park
Soyoung Byun
Ha Il Kim
author_sort Junghwan Lee
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Abdominal ultrasonography (US) is the backbone of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Although previous studies have evaluated clinical factors related to surveillance failure, none have focused specifically on US blind spots.<h4>Methods</h4>This study included 1,289 patients who underwent 6 months intervals surveillance using US and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and were eventually diagnosed with single-nodular HCC. Patients were divided into US-detected group (n = 1,062) and US-missed group (HCC detected only by AFP ≥ 20ng/mL; n = 227). Blind spots consisted of four locations: hepatic dome, caudate lobe or around the inferior vena cava, <1 cm beneath the ribs, and the surface of the left lateral segment. Both groups were compared by HCC location, proportional distribution, treatment method, and overall survival.<h4>Results</h4>A higher proportion of HCCs were located within blind spots in the US-missed group than in the US-detected group (64.3% vs. 44.6%, P < 0.001). HCC ≥ 2 cm detected in blind spots was higher than in non-blind areas (60.3% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.001). Blind spot HCCs were more treated with surgery, whereas those located in a non-blind area were more treated with local ablation. Patients with an HCC located within a blind spot in the US-detected group had better overall survival than the same in the US-missed group (P = 0.008).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Using the current surveillance test, blind spots affected the initially detected HCC tumor size, applicability of the treatment modality, and overall survival. Physicians should pay attention to US blind spots when performing US-based HCC surveillance.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:51:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c47531f150224d4d869515df04be242d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:51:46Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-c47531f150224d4d869515df04be242d2022-12-22T04:06:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179e027474710.1371/journal.pone.0274747Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.Junghwan LeeSu Bee ParkSoyoung ByunHa Il Kim<h4>Background</h4>Abdominal ultrasonography (US) is the backbone of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Although previous studies have evaluated clinical factors related to surveillance failure, none have focused specifically on US blind spots.<h4>Methods</h4>This study included 1,289 patients who underwent 6 months intervals surveillance using US and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and were eventually diagnosed with single-nodular HCC. Patients were divided into US-detected group (n = 1,062) and US-missed group (HCC detected only by AFP ≥ 20ng/mL; n = 227). Blind spots consisted of four locations: hepatic dome, caudate lobe or around the inferior vena cava, <1 cm beneath the ribs, and the surface of the left lateral segment. Both groups were compared by HCC location, proportional distribution, treatment method, and overall survival.<h4>Results</h4>A higher proportion of HCCs were located within blind spots in the US-missed group than in the US-detected group (64.3% vs. 44.6%, P < 0.001). HCC ≥ 2 cm detected in blind spots was higher than in non-blind areas (60.3% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.001). Blind spot HCCs were more treated with surgery, whereas those located in a non-blind area were more treated with local ablation. Patients with an HCC located within a blind spot in the US-detected group had better overall survival than the same in the US-missed group (P = 0.008).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Using the current surveillance test, blind spots affected the initially detected HCC tumor size, applicability of the treatment modality, and overall survival. Physicians should pay attention to US blind spots when performing US-based HCC surveillance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274747
spellingShingle Junghwan Lee
Su Bee Park
Soyoung Byun
Ha Il Kim
Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
PLoS ONE
title Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
title_full Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
title_fullStr Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
title_short Impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance.
title_sort impact of ultrasonographic blind spots for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma during surveillance
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274747
work_keys_str_mv AT junghwanlee impactofultrasonographicblindspotsforearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaduringsurveillance
AT subeepark impactofultrasonographicblindspotsforearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaduringsurveillance
AT soyoungbyun impactofultrasonographicblindspotsforearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaduringsurveillance
AT hailkim impactofultrasonographicblindspotsforearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaduringsurveillance