Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies
Measuring the quality of political regimes is a field that occupies a traditional place in statistical studies that have the subject of studying the characteristics of the political system as an important segment of the explanation of the behavior of states in international relations. In a desire fo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | srp |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies, Belgrade
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-150X/2018/1821-150X1801075X.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819140564359053312 |
|---|---|
| author | Stekić Nenad |
| author_facet | Stekić Nenad |
| author_sort | Stekić Nenad |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Measuring the quality of political regimes is a field that occupies a traditional place in statistical studies that have the subject of studying the characteristics of the political system as an important segment of the explanation of the behavior of states in international relations. In a desire for a comprehensive and complete spatial and temporal interaction, researchers seek to classify data categories through an extremely complex set that represents the starting point for further research. The aim of this article is a comparative overview of the most used quantitative instruments of the level of the political regime. In addition, the author points to the advantages or limitations of certain databases. The subject of the comparative presentation are the following databases: Polity IV, Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy-LIED, Authoritarian Regime Dataset, Varieties of Democracy, and other data sets relevant to statistical testing. In addition, the author presents the problems that researchers in security studies meet in "measuring" the level of the political regime, that is, quantifying the relationship between democracy and autocracy. The method of descriptive statistics will be used in order to present the most important statistical cross-sections of the instruments used in modern research. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:40:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c47786ad21e940bd93f091543e4c3e0d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1821-150X 2683-5738 |
| language | srp |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:40:34Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies, Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti |
| spelling | doaj.art-c47786ad21e940bd93f091543e4c3e0d2022-12-21T18:27:19ZsrpUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of Security Studies, BelgradeGodišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti1821-150X2683-57382018-01-012018175941821-150X1801075XInstruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studiesStekić Nenad0Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privreduMeasuring the quality of political regimes is a field that occupies a traditional place in statistical studies that have the subject of studying the characteristics of the political system as an important segment of the explanation of the behavior of states in international relations. In a desire for a comprehensive and complete spatial and temporal interaction, researchers seek to classify data categories through an extremely complex set that represents the starting point for further research. The aim of this article is a comparative overview of the most used quantitative instruments of the level of the political regime. In addition, the author points to the advantages or limitations of certain databases. The subject of the comparative presentation are the following databases: Polity IV, Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy-LIED, Authoritarian Regime Dataset, Varieties of Democracy, and other data sets relevant to statistical testing. In addition, the author presents the problems that researchers in security studies meet in "measuring" the level of the political regime, that is, quantifying the relationship between democracy and autocracy. The method of descriptive statistics will be used in order to present the most important statistical cross-sections of the instruments used in modern research.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-150X/2018/1821-150X1801075X.pdfpolitical regimedemocracyautocracyanocracydatabasesquantitative research |
| spellingShingle | Stekić Nenad Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti political regime democracy autocracy anocracy databases quantitative research |
| title | Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| title_full | Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| title_fullStr | Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| title_short | Instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| title_sort | instruments of quantification of the political regime types within the security studies |
| topic | political regime democracy autocracy anocracy databases quantitative research |
| url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-150X/2018/1821-150X1801075X.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stekicnenad instrumentsofquantificationofthepoliticalregimetypeswithinthesecuritystudies |