Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised

Background: Many authors regard counseling self-efficacy (CSE) as important in therapist development and training. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised (CASES-R).Method: T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Hahn, Florian Weck, Michael Witthöft, Franziska Kühne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088/full
_version_ 1819004716888096768
author Daniela Hahn
Florian Weck
Michael Witthöft
Franziska Kühne
author_facet Daniela Hahn
Florian Weck
Michael Witthöft
Franziska Kühne
author_sort Daniela Hahn
collection DOAJ
description Background: Many authors regard counseling self-efficacy (CSE) as important in therapist development and training. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised (CASES-R).Method: The sample consisted of 670 German psychotherapy trainees, who completed an online survey. We examined the factor structure by applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to the instrument as a whole.Results: A bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling model with one general and five specific factors provided the best fit to the data. Omega hierarchical coefficients indicated optimal reliability for the general factor, acceptable reliability for the Action Skills-Revised (AS-R) factor, and insufficient estimates for the remaining factors. The CASES-R scales yielded significant correlations with related measures, but also with therapeutic orientations.Conclusion: We found support for the reliability and validity of the German CASES-R. However, the subdomains (except AS-R) should be interpreted with caution, and we do not recommend the CASES-R for comparisons between psychotherapeutic orientations.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:41:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4778da8c8b34b25932c851bbc37a4a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:41:19Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-c4778da8c8b34b25932c851bbc37a4a52022-12-21T19:23:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-12-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088780088Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-RevisedDaniela Hahn0Florian Weck1Michael Witthöft2Franziska Kühne3Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Institute, University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Institute, University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyBackground: Many authors regard counseling self-efficacy (CSE) as important in therapist development and training. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised (CASES-R).Method: The sample consisted of 670 German psychotherapy trainees, who completed an online survey. We examined the factor structure by applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to the instrument as a whole.Results: A bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling model with one general and five specific factors provided the best fit to the data. Omega hierarchical coefficients indicated optimal reliability for the general factor, acceptable reliability for the Action Skills-Revised (AS-R) factor, and insufficient estimates for the remaining factors. The CASES-R scales yielded significant correlations with related measures, but also with therapeutic orientations.Conclusion: We found support for the reliability and validity of the German CASES-R. However, the subdomains (except AS-R) should be interpreted with caution, and we do not recommend the CASES-R for comparisons between psychotherapeutic orientations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088/fullcounselor activity self-efficacy scalescounseling self-efficacypsychotherapy trainingassessmentfactor structurevalidation
spellingShingle Daniela Hahn
Florian Weck
Michael Witthöft
Franziska Kühne
Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
Frontiers in Psychology
counselor activity self-efficacy scales
counseling self-efficacy
psychotherapy training
assessment
factor structure
validation
title Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
title_full Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
title_fullStr Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
title_short Assessment of Counseling Self-Efficacy: Validation of the German Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales-Revised
title_sort assessment of counseling self efficacy validation of the german counselor activity self efficacy scales revised
topic counselor activity self-efficacy scales
counseling self-efficacy
psychotherapy training
assessment
factor structure
validation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780088/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielahahn assessmentofcounselingselfefficacyvalidationofthegermancounseloractivityselfefficacyscalesrevised
AT florianweck assessmentofcounselingselfefficacyvalidationofthegermancounseloractivityselfefficacyscalesrevised
AT michaelwitthoft assessmentofcounselingselfefficacyvalidationofthegermancounseloractivityselfefficacyscalesrevised
AT franziskakuhne assessmentofcounselingselfefficacyvalidationofthegermancounseloractivityselfefficacyscalesrevised