270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To determine if decellularized costal cartilage (DCC), which could theoretically be obtained “off the shelf,” would provide similar results to autologous cartilage grafts previously studied in this lab, thereby widening the application of our novel nipple engineering approach to al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas Andrew Vernice, Sarah Caughey, Nabih Berri, Xue Dong, Jason Harris, Ryan J. Bender, Jason A. Spector
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001455/type/journal_article
_version_ 1827993771012259840
author Nicholas Andrew Vernice
Sarah Caughey
Nabih Berri
Xue Dong
Jason Harris
Ryan J. Bender
Jason A. Spector
author_facet Nicholas Andrew Vernice
Sarah Caughey
Nabih Berri
Xue Dong
Jason Harris
Ryan J. Bender
Jason A. Spector
author_sort Nicholas Andrew Vernice
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To determine if decellularized costal cartilage (DCC), which could theoretically be obtained “off the shelf,” would provide similar results to autologous cartilage grafts previously studied in this lab, thereby widening the application of our novel nipple engineering approach to all patients undergoing nipple reconstruction. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: PLA scaffolds (diameter: 1.0 cm, height: 1.0 cm) were printed using a PRUSA 3D printer and sterilized. Lamb costal cartilage was minced (1 mm3) or zested (<0.2 mm3) and then decellularized. The quality of decellularization was assessed using DNA quantification and histological analysis. DCC was then packed into PLA scaffolds and implanted subcutaneously into immunocompetent Sprague Dawley rats using a CV flap technique. The constructs were explanted and evaluated up to 6 months after implantation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: All nipple reconstructions showed well-preserved diameter and projection due to persistence of the external scaffolds at 1, 3, and 6 months. Mass and volume of engineered tissue was well-preserved over all timepoints. Compared to implantation values, engineered zested nipples demonstrated a 12% mass increase and a 22% volume increase at 6 months. Minced nipples illustrated a similar mass and volume gain with a 21% increase in mass and a 13% increase in volume at 6 months secondary to infiltration of fibrovascular tissue and growth through scaffold wall pores, respectively. Histologic analysis demonstrated a mild inflammatory infiltrate 1 month after implantation which was replaced by fibrovascular tissue by 3 months that remained stable through 6 months. The processed DCC structure remained unchanged over time. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Using acellular ovine xenograft within bioabsorbable scaffolds, we have engineered neonipples that maintain their volume for at least 6 months. DCC architecture is well-preserved with minimal evidence of immune-mediated degradation. By using DCC, this novel approach to nipple engineering may be applied to any patient requiring reconstruction.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:31:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c47ef43d12654d229ba6b49ab81c32c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:31:01Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-c47ef43d12654d229ba6b49ab81c32c12023-03-10T07:53:49ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612022-04-016454510.1017/cts.2022.145270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine XenograftNicholas Andrew Vernice0Sarah Caughey1Nabih Berri2Xue Dong3Jason Harris4Ryan J. Bender5Jason A. Spector6Weill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineOBJECTIVES/GOALS: To determine if decellularized costal cartilage (DCC), which could theoretically be obtained “off the shelf,” would provide similar results to autologous cartilage grafts previously studied in this lab, thereby widening the application of our novel nipple engineering approach to all patients undergoing nipple reconstruction. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: PLA scaffolds (diameter: 1.0 cm, height: 1.0 cm) were printed using a PRUSA 3D printer and sterilized. Lamb costal cartilage was minced (1 mm3) or zested (<0.2 mm3) and then decellularized. The quality of decellularization was assessed using DNA quantification and histological analysis. DCC was then packed into PLA scaffolds and implanted subcutaneously into immunocompetent Sprague Dawley rats using a CV flap technique. The constructs were explanted and evaluated up to 6 months after implantation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: All nipple reconstructions showed well-preserved diameter and projection due to persistence of the external scaffolds at 1, 3, and 6 months. Mass and volume of engineered tissue was well-preserved over all timepoints. Compared to implantation values, engineered zested nipples demonstrated a 12% mass increase and a 22% volume increase at 6 months. Minced nipples illustrated a similar mass and volume gain with a 21% increase in mass and a 13% increase in volume at 6 months secondary to infiltration of fibrovascular tissue and growth through scaffold wall pores, respectively. Histologic analysis demonstrated a mild inflammatory infiltrate 1 month after implantation which was replaced by fibrovascular tissue by 3 months that remained stable through 6 months. The processed DCC structure remained unchanged over time. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Using acellular ovine xenograft within bioabsorbable scaffolds, we have engineered neonipples that maintain their volume for at least 6 months. DCC architecture is well-preserved with minimal evidence of immune-mediated degradation. By using DCC, this novel approach to nipple engineering may be applied to any patient requiring reconstruction.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001455/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Nicholas Andrew Vernice
Sarah Caughey
Nabih Berri
Xue Dong
Jason Harris
Ryan J. Bender
Jason A. Spector
270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
title_full 270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
title_fullStr 270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
title_full_unstemmed 270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
title_short 270 Neonipple Formation After Implantation Of Acellular Ovine Xenograft
title_sort 270 neonipple formation after implantation of acellular ovine xenograft
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001455/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasandrewvernice 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT sarahcaughey 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT nabihberri 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT xuedong 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT jasonharris 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT ryanjbender 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft
AT jasonaspector 270neonippleformationafterimplantationofacellularovinexenograft