Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog
Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Brno University of Technology
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Mendel |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://mendel-journal.org/index.php/mendel/article/view/202 |
| _version_ | 1828278226676350976 |
|---|---|
| author | Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh Audi Albtoush Ra´fat Al-Msiedeen Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh |
| author_facet | Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh Audi Albtoush Ra´fat Al-Msiedeen Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh |
| author_sort | Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed methodology tries to select the best alternative among available components, using the best decision-making approach. As an integrated method for order preference, the methodology in this paper uses two well-known criterion decision-making procedures, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). By analyzing and selecting the optimal solution among a variety of Out Sourcing (OS) modules, the new model design makes the decision-making process easier. We evaluated two software attributes and predicted which was more effective. In this case, the advantage of utilizing AHP is that it allows the developer to evaluate the structure of the OS selection problem and calculate weights for the chosen criteria. After that, the SAW technique is used to calculate the alternatives ratings for OS components. The integration strategy used in our model and the resulting preference indication, which is produced as an explicit numeric value.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:28:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c4883176ca9040a69b3cea21a5969601 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1803-3814 2571-3701 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:28:27Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Brno University of Technology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Mendel |
| spelling | doaj.art-c4883176ca9040a69b3cea21a59696012022-12-22T02:56:26ZengBrno University of TechnologyMendel1803-38142571-37012022-12-0128210.13164/mendel.2022.2.067Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) MethodologAsmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh0Audi Albtoush1Ra´fat Al-Msiedeen2Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh3Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology, Mu'tah University, Mu'tah 61710, Karak, JordanDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology, Mu'tah University, Mu'tah 61710, Karak, JordanDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology, Mu'tah University, Mu'tah 61710, Karak, JordanDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology, Mu'tah University, Mu'tah 61710, Karak, Jordan Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed methodology tries to select the best alternative among available components, using the best decision-making approach. As an integrated method for order preference, the methodology in this paper uses two well-known criterion decision-making procedures, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). By analyzing and selecting the optimal solution among a variety of Out Sourcing (OS) modules, the new model design makes the decision-making process easier. We evaluated two software attributes and predicted which was more effective. In this case, the advantage of utilizing AHP is that it allows the developer to evaluate the structure of the OS selection problem and calculate weights for the chosen criteria. After that, the SAW technique is used to calculate the alternatives ratings for OS components. The integration strategy used in our model and the resulting preference indication, which is produced as an explicit numeric value. https://mendel-journal.org/index.php/mendel/article/view/202Outsourced SoftwareSAWAHPUsabilityMCDMComponent |
| spellingShingle | Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh Audi Albtoush Ra´fat Al-Msiedeen Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog Mendel Outsourced Software SAW AHP Usability MCDM Component |
| title | Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog |
| title_full | Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog |
| title_fullStr | Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog |
| title_short | Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog |
| title_sort | evaluate database management system quality by analytic hierarchy process ahp and simple additive weighting saw methodolog |
| topic | Outsourced Software SAW AHP Usability MCDM Component |
| url | https://mendel-journal.org/index.php/mendel/article/view/202 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT asmaajameelalnawaiseh evaluatedatabasemanagementsystemqualitybyanalytichierarchyprocessahpandsimpleadditiveweightingsawmethodolog AT audialbtoush evaluatedatabasemanagementsystemqualitybyanalytichierarchyprocessahpandsimpleadditiveweightingsawmethodolog AT rafatalmsiedeen evaluatedatabasemanagementsystemqualitybyanalytichierarchyprocessahpandsimpleadditiveweightingsawmethodolog AT sabahjamilalnawaiseh evaluatedatabasemanagementsystemqualitybyanalytichierarchyprocessahpandsimpleadditiveweightingsawmethodolog |