Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor

Abstract Background The anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac determine the sensory block level of spinal anesthesia; however, whether they show the same predictive value during continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) remains undetermined. We designed the present study to verify the efficacy of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen-yang Xu, Can Liu, Xiao-ju Jin, Fan Yang, Fang Xu, Wan-Di Qian, Wen-jun Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-11-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01485-5
_version_ 1818982150451494912
author Chen-yang Xu
Can Liu
Xiao-ju Jin
Fan Yang
Fang Xu
Wan-Di Qian
Wen-jun Guo
author_facet Chen-yang Xu
Can Liu
Xiao-ju Jin
Fan Yang
Fang Xu
Wan-Di Qian
Wen-jun Guo
author_sort Chen-yang Xu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac determine the sensory block level of spinal anesthesia; however, whether they show the same predictive value during continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) remains undetermined. We designed the present study to verify the efficacy of the anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac in predicting the sensory block level during labor analgesia. Methods A total of 122 parturients with singleton pregnancies requesting labor analgesia were included in this study. The lumbar dural sac diameter (DSD), lumbar dural sac length (DSL), lumbar dural sac surface area (DSA), and lumbar dural sac volume (DSV) were measured with an ultrasound color Doppler diagnostic apparatus. CEA was performed at the L2-L3 interspace. After epidural cannulation, an electronic infusion pump containing 0.08% ropivacaine and sufentanil 0.4 μg/ml was connected. The sensory block level was determined with alcohol-soaked cotton, a cotton swab, and a pinprick. The analgesic efficacy of CEA was determined with a visual analog scale (VAS). The parturients were divided into two groups, “ideal analgesia” and “nonideal analgesia,” and the groups were compared by t test. Pearson’s correlation was performed to evaluate the association between the anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac and sensory block level. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to create a model for predicting the sensory block level. Results In the ideal analgesia group, the height, DSL, DSA, DSV and DSD were significantly smaller, and the body mass index (BMI) was significantly larger (P < 0.05). In addition, the DSL demonstrated the strongest correlation with the peak level of pain block (r = − 0.816, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2A), temperature block (r = − 0.874, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3A) and tactile block (r = − 0.727, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4A). Finally, the multiple linear regression analysis revealed that DSL and BMI contributed to predicting the peak sensory block level. Conclusion In conclusion, our study shows that the sensory block level of CEA is higher when the DSL, DSA, DSV and DSD of puerperae are lower. DSL and BMI can be treated as predictors of the peak sensory block level in CEA during labor analgesia.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:42:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c48e9d43af8444fbbe64a76ec88b6a92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:42:38Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-c48e9d43af8444fbbe64a76ec88b6a922022-12-21T19:31:05ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532021-11-012111910.1186/s12871-021-01485-5Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during laborChen-yang Xu0Can Liu1Xiao-ju Jin2Fan Yang3Fang Xu4Wan-Di Qian5Wen-jun Guo6Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeAbstract Background The anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac determine the sensory block level of spinal anesthesia; however, whether they show the same predictive value during continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) remains undetermined. We designed the present study to verify the efficacy of the anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac in predicting the sensory block level during labor analgesia. Methods A total of 122 parturients with singleton pregnancies requesting labor analgesia were included in this study. The lumbar dural sac diameter (DSD), lumbar dural sac length (DSL), lumbar dural sac surface area (DSA), and lumbar dural sac volume (DSV) were measured with an ultrasound color Doppler diagnostic apparatus. CEA was performed at the L2-L3 interspace. After epidural cannulation, an electronic infusion pump containing 0.08% ropivacaine and sufentanil 0.4 μg/ml was connected. The sensory block level was determined with alcohol-soaked cotton, a cotton swab, and a pinprick. The analgesic efficacy of CEA was determined with a visual analog scale (VAS). The parturients were divided into two groups, “ideal analgesia” and “nonideal analgesia,” and the groups were compared by t test. Pearson’s correlation was performed to evaluate the association between the anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac and sensory block level. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to create a model for predicting the sensory block level. Results In the ideal analgesia group, the height, DSL, DSA, DSV and DSD were significantly smaller, and the body mass index (BMI) was significantly larger (P < 0.05). In addition, the DSL demonstrated the strongest correlation with the peak level of pain block (r = − 0.816, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2A), temperature block (r = − 0.874, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3A) and tactile block (r = − 0.727, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4A). Finally, the multiple linear regression analysis revealed that DSL and BMI contributed to predicting the peak sensory block level. Conclusion In conclusion, our study shows that the sensory block level of CEA is higher when the DSL, DSA, DSV and DSD of puerperae are lower. DSL and BMI can be treated as predictors of the peak sensory block level in CEA during labor analgesia.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01485-5Dural sacUltrasoundLabor analgesiaContinuous epidural anesthesia
spellingShingle Chen-yang Xu
Can Liu
Xiao-ju Jin
Fan Yang
Fang Xu
Wan-Di Qian
Wen-jun Guo
Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
BMC Anesthesiology
Dural sac
Ultrasound
Labor analgesia
Continuous epidural anesthesia
title Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
title_full Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
title_fullStr Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
title_short Anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
title_sort anatomical dimensions of the lumbar dural sac predict the sensory block level of continuous epidural analgesia during labor
topic Dural sac
Ultrasound
Labor analgesia
Continuous epidural anesthesia
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01485-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyangxu anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT canliu anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT xiaojujin anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT fanyang anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT fangxu anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT wandiqian anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT wenjunguo anatomicaldimensionsofthelumbarduralsacpredictthesensoryblocklevelofcontinuousepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor