John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method
John White and John Shearman were two of Johannes Wilde’s most brilliant students at the Courtauld. Although Wilde did not espouse a method his own concentration on site-specifics of works of art and interest in reconstruction, which was such an important component in his students’ work, can be trac...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2009-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/media_139132_en.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811300705016741888 |
|---|---|
| author | Ian Verstegen |
| author_facet | Ian Verstegen |
| author_sort | Ian Verstegen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | John White and John Shearman were two of Johannes Wilde’s most brilliant students at the Courtauld. Although Wilde did not espouse a method his own concentration on site-specifics of works of art and interest in reconstruction, which was such an important component in his students’ work, can be traced back to Vienna school interests in intense knowledge of the artwork and parallels some of the classic pronouncements of the ‘second’ Vienna school of Hans Sedlmayr and Otto Pächt. By examining Wilde’s method, and various of White’s and Shearman’s studies, this point is demonstrated. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:55:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c4930aec3eb543a89558a003f7ff373c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2042-4752 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:55:24Z |
| publishDate | 2009-12-01 |
| publisher | Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Art Historiography |
| spelling | doaj.art-c4930aec3eb543a89558a003f7ff373c2022-12-22T02:57:16ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522009-12-0111IV/1John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical MethodIan VerstegenJohn White and John Shearman were two of Johannes Wilde’s most brilliant students at the Courtauld. Although Wilde did not espouse a method his own concentration on site-specifics of works of art and interest in reconstruction, which was such an important component in his students’ work, can be traced back to Vienna school interests in intense knowledge of the artwork and parallels some of the classic pronouncements of the ‘second’ Vienna school of Hans Sedlmayr and Otto Pächt. By examining Wilde’s method, and various of White’s and Shearman’s studies, this point is demonstrated.http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/media_139132_en.pdfWildeShearmanJohn WhiteSecond Vienna School |
| spellingShingle | Ian Verstegen John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method Journal of Art Historiography Wilde Shearman John White Second Vienna School |
| title | John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method |
| title_full | John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method |
| title_fullStr | John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method |
| title_full_unstemmed | John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method |
| title_short | John White’s and John Shearman’s Viennese Art Historical Method |
| title_sort | john white s and john shearman s viennese art historical method |
| topic | Wilde Shearman John White Second Vienna School |
| url | http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/media_139132_en.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ianverstegen johnwhitesandjohnshearmansviennesearthistoricalmethod |