Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study

Abstract Background Cardiovascular death is a common outcome in population-based studies about new healthcare interventions or treatments, such as new prescription medications. Vital statistics registration systems are often the preferred source of information about cause-specific mortality because...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa M. Lix, Shamsia Sobhan, Audray St-Jean, Jean-Marc Daigle, Anat Fisher, Oriana H. Y. Yu, Sophie Dell’Aniello, Nianping Hu, Shawn C. Bugden, Baiju R. Shah, Paul E. Ronksley, Silvia Alessi-Severini, Antonios Douros, Pierre Ernst, Kristian B. Filion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06762-0
_version_ 1818909196211453952
author Lisa M. Lix
Shamsia Sobhan
Audray St-Jean
Jean-Marc Daigle
Anat Fisher
Oriana H. Y. Yu
Sophie Dell’Aniello
Nianping Hu
Shawn C. Bugden
Baiju R. Shah
Paul E. Ronksley
Silvia Alessi-Severini
Antonios Douros
Pierre Ernst
Kristian B. Filion
author_facet Lisa M. Lix
Shamsia Sobhan
Audray St-Jean
Jean-Marc Daigle
Anat Fisher
Oriana H. Y. Yu
Sophie Dell’Aniello
Nianping Hu
Shawn C. Bugden
Baiju R. Shah
Paul E. Ronksley
Silvia Alessi-Severini
Antonios Douros
Pierre Ernst
Kristian B. Filion
author_sort Lisa M. Lix
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cardiovascular death is a common outcome in population-based studies about new healthcare interventions or treatments, such as new prescription medications. Vital statistics registration systems are often the preferred source of information about cause-specific mortality because they capture verified information about the deceased, but they may not always be accessible for linkage with other sources of population-based data. We assessed the validity of an algorithm applied to administrative health records for identifying cardiovascular deaths in population-based data. Methods Administrative health records were from an existing multi-database cohort study about sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a new class of antidiabetic medications. Data were from 2013 to 2018 for five Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec) and the United Kingdom (UK) Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The cardiovascular mortality algorithm was based on in-hospital cardiovascular deaths identified from diagnosis codes and select out-of-hospital deaths. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for the cardiovascular mortality algorithm using vital statistics registrations as the reference standard. Overall and stratified estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed; the latter were produced by site, location of death, sex, and age. Results The cohort included 20,607 individuals (58.3% male; 77.2% ≥70 years). When compared to vital statistics registrations, the cardiovascular mortality algorithm had overall sensitivity of 64.8% (95% CI 63.6, 66.0); site-specific estimates ranged from 54.8 to 87.3%. Overall specificity was 74.9% (95% CI 74.1, 75.6) and overall PPV was 54.5% (95% CI 53.7, 55.3), while site-specific PPV ranged from 33.9 to 72.8%. The cardiovascular mortality algorithm had sensitivity of 57.1% (95% CI 55.4, 58.8) for in-hospital deaths and 72.3% (95% CI 70.8, 73.9) for out-of-hospital deaths; specificity was 88.8% (95% CI 88.1, 89.5) for in-hospital deaths and 58.5% (95% CI 57.3, 59.7) for out-of-hospital deaths. Conclusions A cardiovascular mortality algorithm applied to administrative health records had moderate validity when compared to vital statistics data. Substantial variation existed across study sites representing different geographic locations and two healthcare systems. These variations may reflect different diagnostic coding practices and healthcare utilization patterns.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T22:23:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c498e39bd3c644369e0c1baf1364ede1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T22:23:04Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-c498e39bd3c644369e0c1baf1364ede12022-12-21T20:03:35ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-07-0121111110.1186/s12913-021-06762-0Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort studyLisa M. Lix0Shamsia Sobhan1Audray St-Jean2Jean-Marc Daigle3Anat Fisher4Oriana H. Y. Yu5Sophie Dell’Aniello6Nianping Hu7Shawn C. Bugden8Baiju R. Shah9Paul E. Ronksley10Silvia Alessi-Severini11Antonios Douros12Pierre Ernst13Kristian B. Filion14Department of Community Health Sciences, University of ManitobaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of ManitobaCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalInstitut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS)Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British ColumbiaCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalThe Health Quality CouncilCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of ManitobaICESDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of ManitobaCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General HospitalAbstract Background Cardiovascular death is a common outcome in population-based studies about new healthcare interventions or treatments, such as new prescription medications. Vital statistics registration systems are often the preferred source of information about cause-specific mortality because they capture verified information about the deceased, but they may not always be accessible for linkage with other sources of population-based data. We assessed the validity of an algorithm applied to administrative health records for identifying cardiovascular deaths in population-based data. Methods Administrative health records were from an existing multi-database cohort study about sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a new class of antidiabetic medications. Data were from 2013 to 2018 for five Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec) and the United Kingdom (UK) Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The cardiovascular mortality algorithm was based on in-hospital cardiovascular deaths identified from diagnosis codes and select out-of-hospital deaths. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for the cardiovascular mortality algorithm using vital statistics registrations as the reference standard. Overall and stratified estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed; the latter were produced by site, location of death, sex, and age. Results The cohort included 20,607 individuals (58.3% male; 77.2% ≥70 years). When compared to vital statistics registrations, the cardiovascular mortality algorithm had overall sensitivity of 64.8% (95% CI 63.6, 66.0); site-specific estimates ranged from 54.8 to 87.3%. Overall specificity was 74.9% (95% CI 74.1, 75.6) and overall PPV was 54.5% (95% CI 53.7, 55.3), while site-specific PPV ranged from 33.9 to 72.8%. The cardiovascular mortality algorithm had sensitivity of 57.1% (95% CI 55.4, 58.8) for in-hospital deaths and 72.3% (95% CI 70.8, 73.9) for out-of-hospital deaths; specificity was 88.8% (95% CI 88.1, 89.5) for in-hospital deaths and 58.5% (95% CI 57.3, 59.7) for out-of-hospital deaths. Conclusions A cardiovascular mortality algorithm applied to administrative health records had moderate validity when compared to vital statistics data. Substantial variation existed across study sites representing different geographic locations and two healthcare systems. These variations may reflect different diagnostic coding practices and healthcare utilization patterns.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06762-0AccuracyCause-specific mortalityDeath certificatesHospital recordsPhysician claimsValidation
spellingShingle Lisa M. Lix
Shamsia Sobhan
Audray St-Jean
Jean-Marc Daigle
Anat Fisher
Oriana H. Y. Yu
Sophie Dell’Aniello
Nianping Hu
Shawn C. Bugden
Baiju R. Shah
Paul E. Ronksley
Silvia Alessi-Severini
Antonios Douros
Pierre Ernst
Kristian B. Filion
Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
BMC Health Services Research
Accuracy
Cause-specific mortality
Death certificates
Hospital records
Physician claims
Validation
title Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
title_full Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
title_short Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database population-based cohort study
title_sort validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records a multi database population based cohort study
topic Accuracy
Cause-specific mortality
Death certificates
Hospital records
Physician claims
Validation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06762-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lisamlix validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT shamsiasobhan validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT audraystjean validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT jeanmarcdaigle validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT anatfisher validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT orianahyyu validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT sophiedellaniello validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT nianpinghu validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT shawncbugden validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT baijurshah validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT pauleronksley validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT silviaalessiseverini validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT antoniosdouros validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT pierreernst validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT kristianbfilion validityofanalgorithmtoidentifycardiovasculardeathsfromadministrativehealthrecordsamultidatabasepopulationbasedcohortstudy