A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Background: Neither paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (P-H) nor docetaxel-cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab (TC-H) have been prospectively compared in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). A randomized trial was performed to assess the feasibility of a larger study. Methods: Lower-risk HER2-posit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ricardo Fernandes, Terry L. Ng, Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani, Jacques Raphael, Phillip Blanchette, Morgan Black, Carol Stober, Gregory R. Pond, David Cella, Lisa Vandermeer, Mohammed Ibrahim, Mark Clemons
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Current Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/30/8/535
_version_ 1797585067574296576
author Ricardo Fernandes
Terry L. Ng
Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani
Jacques Raphael
Phillip Blanchette
Morgan Black
Carol Stober
Gregory R. Pond
David Cella
Lisa Vandermeer
Mohammed Ibrahim
Mark Clemons
author_facet Ricardo Fernandes
Terry L. Ng
Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani
Jacques Raphael
Phillip Blanchette
Morgan Black
Carol Stober
Gregory R. Pond
David Cella
Lisa Vandermeer
Mohammed Ibrahim
Mark Clemons
author_sort Ricardo Fernandes
collection DOAJ
description Background: Neither paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (P-H) nor docetaxel-cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab (TC-H) have been prospectively compared in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). A randomized trial was performed to assess the feasibility of a larger study. Methods: Lower-risk HER2-positive EBC patients were randomized to either P-H or TC-H treatment arms. The co-primary feasibility outcomes were: ≥75% patient acceptability rate, active trial participation of ≥50% of medical oncologists, ≥75% and ≥90% treatment completion, and receipt rate of planned cycles of chemotherapy, respectively. Secondary outcomes: Febrile neutropenia (FN) rate, treatment-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Analyses were performed by per protocol and intention-to-treat. Results: Between May 2019 and March 2021, 49 of 52 patients agreed to study participation (94% acceptability rate). Fifteen (65%) of 23 medical oncologists approached patients. Rates of FN were higher (8.3% vs. 0%) in the TC-H vs. P-H arm. Median (IQR) changes in scores from baseline in FACT-Taxane Trial Outcome Index at 24 weeks were −4 (−10, −1) vs. −6.5 (−15, −2) for TC-H and P-H arms, respectively. Conclusions: A randomized trial comparing P-H and TC-H was feasible. Expansion to a larger trial would be feasible to explore patient-reported outcomes of these adjuvant HER2 chemotherapy regimens.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:01:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4a34249d38c4c15b7d83418937e50a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1198-0052
1718-7729
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:01:37Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Current Oncology
spelling doaj.art-c4a34249d38c4c15b7d83418937e50a62023-11-19T00:46:29ZengMDPI AGCurrent Oncology1198-00521718-77292023-08-013087384739710.3390/curroncol30080535A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast CancerRicardo Fernandes0Terry L. Ng1Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani2Jacques Raphael3Phillip Blanchette4Morgan Black5Carol Stober6Gregory R. Pond7David Cella8Lisa Vandermeer9Mohammed Ibrahim10Mark Clemons11Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, CanadaCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, CanadaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USACancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDivision of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaBackground: Neither paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (P-H) nor docetaxel-cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab (TC-H) have been prospectively compared in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). A randomized trial was performed to assess the feasibility of a larger study. Methods: Lower-risk HER2-positive EBC patients were randomized to either P-H or TC-H treatment arms. The co-primary feasibility outcomes were: ≥75% patient acceptability rate, active trial participation of ≥50% of medical oncologists, ≥75% and ≥90% treatment completion, and receipt rate of planned cycles of chemotherapy, respectively. Secondary outcomes: Febrile neutropenia (FN) rate, treatment-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Analyses were performed by per protocol and intention-to-treat. Results: Between May 2019 and March 2021, 49 of 52 patients agreed to study participation (94% acceptability rate). Fifteen (65%) of 23 medical oncologists approached patients. Rates of FN were higher (8.3% vs. 0%) in the TC-H vs. P-H arm. Median (IQR) changes in scores from baseline in FACT-Taxane Trial Outcome Index at 24 weeks were −4 (−10, −1) vs. −6.5 (−15, −2) for TC-H and P-H arms, respectively. Conclusions: A randomized trial comparing P-H and TC-H was feasible. Expansion to a larger trial would be feasible to explore patient-reported outcomes of these adjuvant HER2 chemotherapy regimens.https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/30/8/535early-stage breast cancerHER2-positivetrastuzumabchemotherapy
spellingShingle Ricardo Fernandes
Terry L. Ng
Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani
Jacques Raphael
Phillip Blanchette
Morgan Black
Carol Stober
Gregory R. Pond
David Cella
Lisa Vandermeer
Mohammed Ibrahim
Mark Clemons
A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Current Oncology
early-stage breast cancer
HER2-positive
trastuzumab
chemotherapy
title A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
title_full A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
title_short A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
title_sort multi centre randomized study comparing two standard of care chemotherapy regimens for lower risk her2 positive breast cancer
topic early-stage breast cancer
HER2-positive
trastuzumab
chemotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/30/8/535
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardofernandes amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT terrylng amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT masharijemaanalzahrani amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT jacquesraphael amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT phillipblanchette amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT morganblack amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT carolstober amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT gregoryrpond amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT davidcella amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT lisavandermeer amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT mohammedibrahim amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT markclemons amulticentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT ricardofernandes multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT terrylng multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT masharijemaanalzahrani multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT jacquesraphael multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT phillipblanchette multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT morganblack multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT carolstober multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT gregoryrpond multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT davidcella multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT lisavandermeer multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT mohammedibrahim multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer
AT markclemons multicentrerandomizedstudycomparingtwostandardofcarechemotherapyregimensforlowerriskher2positivebreastcancer