Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow

In a companion study we have investigated the pattern of dependence of human heading estimation on the quantity (amount of dots per frame) and quality (amount of directional noise) of motion information in an optic flow field. In the present study we investigated whether the flow parsing mechanism,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew J Foulkes, Simon K. Rushton, Paul A Warren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00049/full
_version_ 1818049669152899072
author Andrew J Foulkes
Simon K. Rushton
Paul A Warren
author_facet Andrew J Foulkes
Simon K. Rushton
Paul A Warren
author_sort Andrew J Foulkes
collection DOAJ
description In a companion study we have investigated the pattern of dependence of human heading estimation on the quantity (amount of dots per frame) and quality (amount of directional noise) of motion information in an optic flow field. In the present study we investigated whether the flow parsing mechanism, which is thought to aid in the assessment of scene-relative object movement during observer movement, exhibits a similar pattern of dependence on these stimulus manipulations. Finding that the pattern of flow parsing effects was similar to the that observed for heading thresholds would provide some evidence that these two complementary roles for optic flow processing are reliant on the same, or similar, neural computation. We found that the pattern of flow parsing effects observed does indeed display a striking similarity to the heading thresholds. As with judgements of heading, there is a critical value of around 25 dots per frame; below this value flow parsing effects rapidly deteriorate and above this value flow parsing effects are stable (see Warren et al. (1988) for similar results for heading). Again, as with judgements of heading, when there were 50 or more dots there was a systematic effect of noise on the magnitude of the flow parsing effect. These results are discussed in the context of different possible schemes of flow processing to support both heading and flow parsing mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:41:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4a8b115498841a89b97f74c8b6dfb5d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:41:15Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-c4a8b115498841a89b97f74c8b6dfb5d2022-12-22T01:52:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532013-06-01710.3389/fnbeh.2013.0004939978Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flowAndrew J Foulkes0Simon K. Rushton1Paul A Warren2University of ManchesterCardiff UniversityUniversity of ManchesterIn a companion study we have investigated the pattern of dependence of human heading estimation on the quantity (amount of dots per frame) and quality (amount of directional noise) of motion information in an optic flow field. In the present study we investigated whether the flow parsing mechanism, which is thought to aid in the assessment of scene-relative object movement during observer movement, exhibits a similar pattern of dependence on these stimulus manipulations. Finding that the pattern of flow parsing effects was similar to the that observed for heading thresholds would provide some evidence that these two complementary roles for optic flow processing are reliant on the same, or similar, neural computation. We found that the pattern of flow parsing effects observed does indeed display a striking similarity to the heading thresholds. As with judgements of heading, there is a critical value of around 25 dots per frame; below this value flow parsing effects rapidly deteriorate and above this value flow parsing effects are stable (see Warren et al. (1988) for similar results for heading). Again, as with judgements of heading, when there were 50 or more dots there was a systematic effect of noise on the magnitude of the flow parsing effect. These results are discussed in the context of different possible schemes of flow processing to support both heading and flow parsing mechanisms.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00049/fullHeadingOptic flow processingflow parsingobject movementego-motion
spellingShingle Andrew J Foulkes
Simon K. Rushton
Paul A Warren
Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Heading
Optic flow processing
flow parsing
object movement
ego-motion
title Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
title_full Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
title_fullStr Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
title_full_unstemmed Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
title_short Flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
title_sort flow parsing and heading perception show similar dependence on quality and quantity of optic flow
topic Heading
Optic flow processing
flow parsing
object movement
ego-motion
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00049/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewjfoulkes flowparsingandheadingperceptionshowsimilardependenceonqualityandquantityofopticflow
AT simonkrushton flowparsingandheadingperceptionshowsimilardependenceonqualityandquantityofopticflow
AT paulawarren flowparsingandheadingperceptionshowsimilardependenceonqualityandquantityofopticflow