Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data

The main quantitative measure of nuclear safeguards effectiveness is nuclear material accounting (NMA), which consists of sequences of measured material balances that should be close to zero if there is no loss of special nuclear material such as Pu. NMA is essentially “accounting with measurement e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Burr, M.S. Hamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Prognostics and Health Management Society 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2206
_version_ 1818586102129229824
author T. Burr
M.S. Hamada
author_facet T. Burr
M.S. Hamada
author_sort T. Burr
collection DOAJ
description The main quantitative measure of nuclear safeguards effectiveness is nuclear material accounting (NMA), which consists of sequences of measured material balances that should be close to zero if there is no loss of special nuclear material such as Pu. NMA is essentially “accounting with measurement errors,” which arise from good, but imperfect, measurements. The covariance matrix MB of a sequence of material balances is the key quantity that determines the probability to detect loss. There is a recent push to include process monitoring (PM) data along with material balances from NMA in new schemes to monitor for material loss. PM data includes near-real-time measurements by the operator to monitor and control process operations. One concern regarding PM data is the need to estimate normal behavior of PM residuals, which requires a training period prior to ongoing testing for material loss. Assuming that a training period is used for PM data prior to its use in statistical testing for loss, that same training period could also be used for improving the estimate of MB that is used in NMA. We consider updating MB using training data with a Bayesian approach. A simulation study assesses the improvement gained with larger amounts of training data.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:47:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4b730fc97654b7f8b157ee5ca375b33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2153-2648
2153-2648
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:47:37Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher The Prognostics and Health Management Society
record_format Article
series International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
spelling doaj.art-c4b730fc97654b7f8b157ee5ca375b332022-12-21T22:37:34ZengThe Prognostics and Health Management SocietyInternational Journal of Prognostics and Health Management2153-26482153-26482014-01-0151doi:10.36001/ijphm.2014.v5i1.2206Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training DataT. Burr0M.S. Hamada1Statistical Sciences Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM 87545, USAStatistical Sciences Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM 87545, USAThe main quantitative measure of nuclear safeguards effectiveness is nuclear material accounting (NMA), which consists of sequences of measured material balances that should be close to zero if there is no loss of special nuclear material such as Pu. NMA is essentially “accounting with measurement errors,” which arise from good, but imperfect, measurements. The covariance matrix MB of a sequence of material balances is the key quantity that determines the probability to detect loss. There is a recent push to include process monitoring (PM) data along with material balances from NMA in new schemes to monitor for material loss. PM data includes near-real-time measurements by the operator to monitor and control process operations. One concern regarding PM data is the need to estimate normal behavior of PM residuals, which requires a training period prior to ongoing testing for material loss. Assuming that a training period is used for PM data prior to its use in statistical testing for loss, that same training period could also be used for improving the estimate of MB that is used in NMA. We consider updating MB using training data with a Bayesian approach. A simulation study assesses the improvement gained with larger amounts of training data.https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2206nuclear material accountingprocess monitoringbayesian updating of covariance matrix
spellingShingle T. Burr
M.S. Hamada
Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
nuclear material accounting
process monitoring
bayesian updating of covariance matrix
title Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
title_full Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
title_fullStr Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
title_short Bayesian Updating of Material Balances Covariance Matrices Using Training Data
title_sort bayesian updating of material balances covariance matrices using training data
topic nuclear material accounting
process monitoring
bayesian updating of covariance matrix
url https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2206
work_keys_str_mv AT tburr bayesianupdatingofmaterialbalancescovariancematricesusingtrainingdata
AT mshamada bayesianupdatingofmaterialbalancescovariancematricesusingtrainingdata