Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame

Currently three up-to-date Terrestrial Reference Frames (TRF) are available, the ITRF2014 from IGN, the DTRF2014 from DGFI-TUM, and JTRF2014 from JPL. All use the identical input data of space-geodetic station positions and Earth orientation parameters, but the concept of combining these data is fun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Karbon, Santiago Belda, Tobias Nilsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2019-01-01
Series:Geodesy and Geodynamics
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498471730188X
_version_ 1818412917319532544
author Maria Karbon
Santiago Belda
Tobias Nilsson
author_facet Maria Karbon
Santiago Belda
Tobias Nilsson
author_sort Maria Karbon
collection DOAJ
description Currently three up-to-date Terrestrial Reference Frames (TRF) are available, the ITRF2014 from IGN, the DTRF2014 from DGFI-TUM, and JTRF2014 from JPL. All use the identical input data of space-geodetic station positions and Earth orientation parameters, but the concept of combining these data is fundamentally different. The IGN approach is based on the combination of technique solutions, while the DGFI is combining the normal equation systems. Both yield in reference epoch coordinates and velocities for a global set of stations. JPL uses a Kalman filter approach, realizing a TRF through weekly time series of geocentric coordinates. As the determination of the CRF is not independent of the TRF and vice versa, the choice of the TRF might impact on the CRF. Within this work we assess this effect.We find that the estimated Earth orientation parameter (EOP) from DTRF2014 agree best with those from ITRF2014, the EOP resulting from JTRF2014 show besides clear yearly signals also some artifacts linked to certain stations. The estimated source position time series however, agree with each other better than ±1μas. When fixing EOP and station positions we can see the maximal effect of the TRF on the CRF. Here large systematics in position as well as proper motion arise. In case of ITRF2008 they can be linked to the missing data after 2008. By allowing the EOP and stations to participate in the adjustment, the agreement increases, however, systematics remain. Keywords: Reference frames, CRF, TRF, DTRF2014, JTRF2014, ITRF2014
first_indexed 2024-12-14T10:54:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4c3f26439b34d2b8cf8ab68367ca450
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-9847
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T10:54:55Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Geodesy and Geodynamics
spelling doaj.art-c4c3f26439b34d2b8cf8ab68367ca4502022-12-21T23:05:00ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Geodesy and Geodynamics1674-98472019-01-011015871Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frameMaria Karbon0Santiago Belda1Tobias Nilsson2Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany; Corresponding author.Image Processing Laboratory (IPL) - Laboratory of Earth Observation (LEO), University of Valencia, Valencia, SpainLantmäteriet, 801 82 Gävle, SwedenCurrently three up-to-date Terrestrial Reference Frames (TRF) are available, the ITRF2014 from IGN, the DTRF2014 from DGFI-TUM, and JTRF2014 from JPL. All use the identical input data of space-geodetic station positions and Earth orientation parameters, but the concept of combining these data is fundamentally different. The IGN approach is based on the combination of technique solutions, while the DGFI is combining the normal equation systems. Both yield in reference epoch coordinates and velocities for a global set of stations. JPL uses a Kalman filter approach, realizing a TRF through weekly time series of geocentric coordinates. As the determination of the CRF is not independent of the TRF and vice versa, the choice of the TRF might impact on the CRF. Within this work we assess this effect.We find that the estimated Earth orientation parameter (EOP) from DTRF2014 agree best with those from ITRF2014, the EOP resulting from JTRF2014 show besides clear yearly signals also some artifacts linked to certain stations. The estimated source position time series however, agree with each other better than ±1μas. When fixing EOP and station positions we can see the maximal effect of the TRF on the CRF. Here large systematics in position as well as proper motion arise. In case of ITRF2008 they can be linked to the missing data after 2008. By allowing the EOP and stations to participate in the adjustment, the agreement increases, however, systematics remain. Keywords: Reference frames, CRF, TRF, DTRF2014, JTRF2014, ITRF2014http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498471730188X
spellingShingle Maria Karbon
Santiago Belda
Tobias Nilsson
Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
Geodesy and Geodynamics
title Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
title_full Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
title_fullStr Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
title_short Impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
title_sort impact of the terrestrial reference frame on the determination of the celestial reference frame
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498471730188X
work_keys_str_mv AT mariakarbon impactoftheterrestrialreferenceframeonthedeterminationofthecelestialreferenceframe
AT santiagobelda impactoftheterrestrialreferenceframeonthedeterminationofthecelestialreferenceframe
AT tobiasnilsson impactoftheterrestrialreferenceframeonthedeterminationofthecelestialreferenceframe