Serological determinants of COVID-19

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annalisa Noce, Maria Luisa Santoro, Giulia Marrone, Cartesio D’Agostini, Ivano Amelio, Andrea Duggento, Manfredi Tesauro, Nicola Di Daniele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:Biology Direct
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13062-020-00276-1
_version_ 1818458263174250496
author Annalisa Noce
Maria Luisa Santoro
Giulia Marrone
Cartesio D’Agostini
Ivano Amelio
Andrea Duggento
Manfredi Tesauro
Nicola Di Daniele
author_facet Annalisa Noce
Maria Luisa Santoro
Giulia Marrone
Cartesio D’Agostini
Ivano Amelio
Andrea Duggento
Manfredi Tesauro
Nicola Di Daniele
author_sort Annalisa Noce
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection. Results We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information. Conclusions FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee “social distancing”.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:55:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c4cf8cd3b66546c0a96ef9108b40aa5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6150
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:55:41Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Biology Direct
spelling doaj.art-c4cf8cd3b66546c0a96ef9108b40aa5f2022-12-21T22:44:36ZengBMCBiology Direct1745-61502020-11-011511910.1186/s13062-020-00276-1Serological determinants of COVID-19Annalisa Noce0Maria Luisa Santoro1Giulia Marrone2Cartesio D’Agostini3Ivano Amelio4Andrea Duggento5Manfredi Tesauro6Nicola Di Daniele7UOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataLaboratory Pathologist Director of Artemisia Lab – AlessandriaUOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor VergataUOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataUOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor VergataAbstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection. Results We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information. Conclusions FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee “social distancing”.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13062-020-00276-1SARS-CoV-2COVID-19Point of careLateral flow immunoassayAutomated chemiluminescent immunoassaySerological tests
spellingShingle Annalisa Noce
Maria Luisa Santoro
Giulia Marrone
Cartesio D’Agostini
Ivano Amelio
Andrea Duggento
Manfredi Tesauro
Nicola Di Daniele
Serological determinants of COVID-19
Biology Direct
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Point of care
Lateral flow immunoassay
Automated chemiluminescent immunoassay
Serological tests
title Serological determinants of COVID-19
title_full Serological determinants of COVID-19
title_fullStr Serological determinants of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Serological determinants of COVID-19
title_short Serological determinants of COVID-19
title_sort serological determinants of covid 19
topic SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Point of care
Lateral flow immunoassay
Automated chemiluminescent immunoassay
Serological tests
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13062-020-00276-1
work_keys_str_mv AT annalisanoce serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT marialuisasantoro serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT giuliamarrone serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT cartesiodagostini serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT ivanoamelio serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT andreaduggento serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT manfreditesauro serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19
AT nicoladidaniele serologicaldeterminantsofcovid19