Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study
Objective Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging. The ability to distinguish between septic and aseptic failure of a joint prosthesis is crucial for treatment strategy optimisation and prognosis prediction. Preoperative tissue cultures are included in many diagnostic algo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of International Medical Research |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231158972 |
_version_ | 1797790993840340992 |
---|---|
author | Hannah Eriksson Stergios Lazarinis |
author_facet | Hannah Eriksson Stergios Lazarinis |
author_sort | Hannah Eriksson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging. The ability to distinguish between septic and aseptic failure of a joint prosthesis is crucial for treatment strategy optimisation and prognosis prediction. Preoperative tissue cultures are included in many diagnostic algorithms; however, studies report different degrees of concordance (63%–85%) with intraoperative cultures. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of tissue biopsies in the preoperative diagnostic process with the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria as a reference and to describe the concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies. Methods This observational retrospective study included 44 patients requiring revision surgery of a total hip or knee arthroplasty, where the diagnostic workup included biopsies of periprosthetic tissue. The accuracy of preoperative biopsies was calculated, and concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies was described. Results The accuracy was 59%, with a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 79%. Full concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies was found in 64% of the cases. Conclusion An open biopsy of periprosthetic tissue cannot reliably confirm or exclude PJI, and, therefore, should not be performed. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T02:12:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c4f8a36759914d70ae92a85854c6b24b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1473-2300 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T02:12:26Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of International Medical Research |
spelling | doaj.art-c4f8a36759914d70ae92a85854c6b24b2023-07-01T00:33:46ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002023-06-015110.1177/03000605231158972Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre studyHannah ErikssonStergios LazarinisObjective Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging. The ability to distinguish between septic and aseptic failure of a joint prosthesis is crucial for treatment strategy optimisation and prognosis prediction. Preoperative tissue cultures are included in many diagnostic algorithms; however, studies report different degrees of concordance (63%–85%) with intraoperative cultures. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of tissue biopsies in the preoperative diagnostic process with the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria as a reference and to describe the concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies. Methods This observational retrospective study included 44 patients requiring revision surgery of a total hip or knee arthroplasty, where the diagnostic workup included biopsies of periprosthetic tissue. The accuracy of preoperative biopsies was calculated, and concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies was described. Results The accuracy was 59%, with a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 79%. Full concordance between microbiological findings in pre- and intraoperative biopsies was found in 64% of the cases. Conclusion An open biopsy of periprosthetic tissue cannot reliably confirm or exclude PJI, and, therefore, should not be performed.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231158972 |
spellingShingle | Hannah Eriksson Stergios Lazarinis Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study Journal of International Medical Research |
title | Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study |
title_full | Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study |
title_fullStr | Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study |
title_short | Low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection: an observational retrospective single-centre study |
title_sort | low accuracy in preoperative tissue biopsies for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection an observational retrospective single centre study |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231158972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hannaheriksson lowaccuracyinpreoperativetissuebiopsiesfordiagnosingchronicperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservationalretrospectivesinglecentrestudy AT stergioslazarinis lowaccuracyinpreoperativetissuebiopsiesfordiagnosingchronicperiprostheticjointinfectionanobservationalretrospectivesinglecentrestudy |