L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique
Starting with a preliminary examination of the notions of discourse and text, this article sets out to characterize the respective epistemological positions of textual semantics (F. Rastier), discursive semiotics (A.-J. Greimas, J. Fontanille) and textual semiotics (L. Hjelmslev). The proposed epist...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Université de liège
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Signata |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/signata/3859 |
| _version_ | 1818468915857063936 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicolas Couégnas |
| author_facet | Nicolas Couégnas |
| author_sort | Nicolas Couégnas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Starting with a preliminary examination of the notions of discourse and text, this article sets out to characterize the respective epistemological positions of textual semantics (F. Rastier), discursive semiotics (A.-J. Greimas, J. Fontanille) and textual semiotics (L. Hjelmslev). The proposed epistemological characterization device allows us to identify both the common immanentist anchoring and the fundamental differences in the epistemological positioning of these close currents of thought, which are essential for semiotics. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T21:18:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c502cd6746a24440b631cfba34106d5c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2032-9806 2565-7097 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T21:18:00Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Université de liège |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Signata |
| spelling | doaj.art-c502cd6746a24440b631cfba34106d5c2022-12-22T02:29:37ZengUniversité de liègeSignata2032-98062565-70972022-06-011310.4000/signata.3859L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotiqueNicolas CouégnasStarting with a preliminary examination of the notions of discourse and text, this article sets out to characterize the respective epistemological positions of textual semantics (F. Rastier), discursive semiotics (A.-J. Greimas, J. Fontanille) and textual semiotics (L. Hjelmslev). The proposed epistemological characterization device allows us to identify both the common immanentist anchoring and the fundamental differences in the epistemological positioning of these close currents of thought, which are essential for semiotics.http://journals.openedition.org/signata/3859epistemologytextdiscoursereflexivityimmanence |
| spellingShingle | Nicolas Couégnas L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique Signata epistemology text discourse reflexivity immanence |
| title | L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique |
| title_full | L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique |
| title_fullStr | L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique |
| title_short | L’épistémologie critique de la sémiotique |
| title_sort | l epistemologie critique de la semiotique |
| topic | epistemology text discourse reflexivity immanence |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/signata/3859 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolascouegnas lepistemologiecritiquedelasemiotique |