Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?

Several studies have claimed that reduction in body size comprises a nearly universal response to global warming; however, doubts about the validity of this pattern for endothermic species have been raised recently. Accordingly, we assessed temporal changes in body mass for 27 bird and 17 mammal spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel E Naya, Hugo Naya, Joseph Cook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5558942?pdf=render
_version_ 1819240309484158976
author Daniel E Naya
Hugo Naya
Joseph Cook
author_facet Daniel E Naya
Hugo Naya
Joseph Cook
author_sort Daniel E Naya
collection DOAJ
description Several studies have claimed that reduction in body size comprises a nearly universal response to global warming; however, doubts about the validity of this pattern for endothermic species have been raised recently. Accordingly, we assessed temporal changes in body mass for 27 bird and 17 mammal species, to evaluate if a reduction in body size during the 20th century is a widespread phenomenon among endothermic vertebrates. In addition, we tested if there are differences in the temporal change in size between birds and mammals, aquatic and terrestrial species, and the first and second half of the 20th century. Overall, six species increased their body mass, 21 species showed no significant changes in size, and 17 species decreased their body mass during the 20th century. Temporal changes in body mass were similar for birds and mammals, but strongly differ between aquatic and terrestrial species: while most of the aquatic species increased or did not change in body mass, most terrestrial species decreased in size. In addition, we found that, at least in terrestrial birds, the mean value of the correlation between body mass and year of collection differs between the first half and the second half of the 20th century, being close to zero for the former period but negative for the later one. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that temporal changes in body mass differ between aquatic and terrestrial species in both mammals and birds.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T14:05:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c50446c06e924c3297a51f3715ef0341
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T14:05:58Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-c50446c06e924c3297a51f3715ef03412022-12-21T17:44:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018305110.1371/journal.pone.0183051Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?Daniel E NayaHugo NayaJoseph CookSeveral studies have claimed that reduction in body size comprises a nearly universal response to global warming; however, doubts about the validity of this pattern for endothermic species have been raised recently. Accordingly, we assessed temporal changes in body mass for 27 bird and 17 mammal species, to evaluate if a reduction in body size during the 20th century is a widespread phenomenon among endothermic vertebrates. In addition, we tested if there are differences in the temporal change in size between birds and mammals, aquatic and terrestrial species, and the first and second half of the 20th century. Overall, six species increased their body mass, 21 species showed no significant changes in size, and 17 species decreased their body mass during the 20th century. Temporal changes in body mass were similar for birds and mammals, but strongly differ between aquatic and terrestrial species: while most of the aquatic species increased or did not change in body mass, most terrestrial species decreased in size. In addition, we found that, at least in terrestrial birds, the mean value of the correlation between body mass and year of collection differs between the first half and the second half of the 20th century, being close to zero for the former period but negative for the later one. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that temporal changes in body mass differ between aquatic and terrestrial species in both mammals and birds.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5558942?pdf=render
spellingShingle Daniel E Naya
Hugo Naya
Joseph Cook
Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
PLoS ONE
title Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
title_full Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
title_fullStr Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
title_full_unstemmed Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
title_short Climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms: Does habitat matter?
title_sort climate change and body size trends in aquatic and terrestrial endotherms does habitat matter
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5558942?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielenaya climatechangeandbodysizetrendsinaquaticandterrestrialendothermsdoeshabitatmatter
AT hugonaya climatechangeandbodysizetrendsinaquaticandterrestrialendothermsdoeshabitatmatter
AT josephcook climatechangeandbodysizetrendsinaquaticandterrestrialendothermsdoeshabitatmatter