Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals
Studies into participation bias have examined participation trends, where it occurs, the factors affecting it, and methods to try to reduce it. However, some authors only discuss participation bias at the end of the study, some acknowledge it and apply a method to try to reduce it, while others igno...
Main Authors: | Claire Keeble, Stuart Barber, Graham Richard Law, Paul D. Baxter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2013-10-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013511260 |
Similar Items
-
Literary Journalism as a Discipline: Tom Wolfe and Beyond
by: Richard Lance Keeble
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The Leading Authors in Three High Impact Dermatology Journals
by: Waseem Hassan, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals
by: Marija Franka Marušić, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.
by: Benjamin Howard, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
The first three years of the Journal of Global Health: Assessing the impact
by: Igor Rudan, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)