Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus

The main aim of the work was to investigate if simple reactor blocks could be combined to adequately represent complex reactor configurations; with the objectives of selecting an appropriate reaction scheme, creating a working simulation and validating the results obtained from the simulation. An et...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tristan Lee Zebert, David Lokhat, Swamy Kurella, B.C. Meikap
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:South African Journal of Chemical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1026918522001056
_version_ 1797955444544634880
author Tristan Lee Zebert
David Lokhat
Swamy Kurella
B.C. Meikap
author_facet Tristan Lee Zebert
David Lokhat
Swamy Kurella
B.C. Meikap
author_sort Tristan Lee Zebert
collection DOAJ
description The main aim of the work was to investigate if simple reactor blocks could be combined to adequately represent complex reactor configurations; with the objectives of selecting an appropriate reaction scheme, creating a working simulation and validating the results obtained from the simulation. An ethane cracker reactor is simulated using Aspen Plus, for a molecular reaction scheme, made up of seven reactions and eight hydrocarbon components; using the kinetics and reactor geometrics. Several assumptions were made such that the fired furnace reactor could be modeled as a series of two plug flow reactors using Aspen Plus. Modeling of a fired furnace reactor for the cracking of ethane is made difficult by the inherent separation between the convection and radiation sections; a difficulty which was overcome by separating the convection region and the radiation region of the fired furnace reactor into two simulations such that temperatures were solved for iteratively. A firebox simulation was created with the intent of finding the optimal fuel and air flow rates that would supply the fired furnace rector with the required 2490 kW; these flow rates were found to be 190 kmol hr−1 and 60 kmol hr−1.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:34:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5103ac1fc9245588bb709fa4c66da8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1026-9185
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:34:20Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Chemical Engineering
spelling doaj.art-c5103ac1fc9245588bb709fa4c66da8c2023-01-12T04:18:28ZengElsevierSouth African Journal of Chemical Engineering1026-91852023-01-0143204214Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen PlusTristan Lee Zebert0David Lokhat1Swamy Kurella2B.C. Meikap3Discipline of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Howard College, University of Kwazulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban 4041, South AfricaDiscipline of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Howard College, University of Kwazulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban 4041, South AfricaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India; Corresponding author at: Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.Discipline of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Howard College, University of Kwazulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban 4041, South Africa; Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, IndiaThe main aim of the work was to investigate if simple reactor blocks could be combined to adequately represent complex reactor configurations; with the objectives of selecting an appropriate reaction scheme, creating a working simulation and validating the results obtained from the simulation. An ethane cracker reactor is simulated using Aspen Plus, for a molecular reaction scheme, made up of seven reactions and eight hydrocarbon components; using the kinetics and reactor geometrics. Several assumptions were made such that the fired furnace reactor could be modeled as a series of two plug flow reactors using Aspen Plus. Modeling of a fired furnace reactor for the cracking of ethane is made difficult by the inherent separation between the convection and radiation sections; a difficulty which was overcome by separating the convection region and the radiation region of the fired furnace reactor into two simulations such that temperatures were solved for iteratively. A firebox simulation was created with the intent of finding the optimal fuel and air flow rates that would supply the fired furnace rector with the required 2490 kW; these flow rates were found to be 190 kmol hr−1 and 60 kmol hr−1.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1026918522001056Fired furnace reactorCrackingHydrocarbonConversionKineticsSimulation
spellingShingle Tristan Lee Zebert
David Lokhat
Swamy Kurella
B.C. Meikap
Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
South African Journal of Chemical Engineering
Fired furnace reactor
Cracking
Hydrocarbon
Conversion
Kinetics
Simulation
title Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
title_full Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
title_fullStr Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
title_full_unstemmed Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
title_short Modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using Aspen Plus
title_sort modeling and simulation of ethane cracker reactor using aspen plus
topic Fired furnace reactor
Cracking
Hydrocarbon
Conversion
Kinetics
Simulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1026918522001056
work_keys_str_mv AT tristanleezebert modelingandsimulationofethanecrackerreactorusingaspenplus
AT davidlokhat modelingandsimulationofethanecrackerreactorusingaspenplus
AT swamykurella modelingandsimulationofethanecrackerreactorusingaspenplus
AT bcmeikap modelingandsimulationofethanecrackerreactorusingaspenplus