Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale

Social psychological research has increasingly extolled the benefits of intergroup contact as a means of promoting positive relations. However, a growing body of research suggests that formal policies of desegregation are often offset by informal ‘micro-ecological’ practices of (re)-segregation, in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonor Bettencourt, John Dixon, Paula Castro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2019-08-01
Series:Social Psychological Bulletin
Online Access:https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/33482/download/pdf/
_version_ 1797970270300930048
author Leonor Bettencourt
John Dixon
Paula Castro
author_facet Leonor Bettencourt
John Dixon
Paula Castro
author_sort Leonor Bettencourt
collection DOAJ
description Social psychological research has increasingly extolled the benefits of intergroup contact as a means of promoting positive relations. However, a growing body of research suggests that formal policies of desegregation are often offset by informal ‘micro-ecological’ practices of (re)-segregation, in everyday life spaces. This paper presents a systematic literature review of recent evidence on this topic (2001-2017), outlining key findings about how, when, where, and why micro-ecological divisions are reproduced. Informal segregation can happen based on ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, gender, or gender and ethnicity, despite people being in a shared place. People generally maintain patterns of ingroup isolation as a result of: a) negative attitudes and stereotypes; b) ingroup identification and threat; or c) feelings of anxiety, fear and insecurity. Educational settings have been the main context studied, followed by leisure and recreational places, public urban places and public transport. The paper also identifies three areas of potential future research, highlighting the need to: (1) capitalise on methodological innovations; (2) explore systematically how, when and why the intersectionality of social categories may shape micro-ecological practices of contact and separation; and (3) understand more fully why micro-ecological patterns of segregation are apparently so persistent, as well as how they might be reduced.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:15:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c525d096ef604ebba6d126c199c724ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1896-1800
2569-653X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:15:19Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Social Psychological Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-c525d096ef604ebba6d126c199c724ad2023-01-02T10:42:26ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologySocial Psychological Bulletin1896-18002569-653X2019-08-0114213510.32872/spb.v14i2.3348233482Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological ScaleLeonor Bettencourt0John Dixon1Paula Castro2Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL)School of Psychology, Open UniversityInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL)Social psychological research has increasingly extolled the benefits of intergroup contact as a means of promoting positive relations. However, a growing body of research suggests that formal policies of desegregation are often offset by informal ‘micro-ecological’ practices of (re)-segregation, in everyday life spaces. This paper presents a systematic literature review of recent evidence on this topic (2001-2017), outlining key findings about how, when, where, and why micro-ecological divisions are reproduced. Informal segregation can happen based on ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, gender, or gender and ethnicity, despite people being in a shared place. People generally maintain patterns of ingroup isolation as a result of: a) negative attitudes and stereotypes; b) ingroup identification and threat; or c) feelings of anxiety, fear and insecurity. Educational settings have been the main context studied, followed by leisure and recreational places, public urban places and public transport. The paper also identifies three areas of potential future research, highlighting the need to: (1) capitalise on methodological innovations; (2) explore systematically how, when and why the intersectionality of social categories may shape micro-ecological practices of contact and separation; and (3) understand more fully why micro-ecological patterns of segregation are apparently so persistent, as well as how they might be reduced.https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/33482/download/pdf/
spellingShingle Leonor Bettencourt
John Dixon
Paula Castro
Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
Social Psychological Bulletin
title Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
title_full Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
title_fullStr Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
title_full_unstemmed Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
title_short Understanding How and Why Spatial Segregation Endures: A Systematic Review of Recent Research on Intergroup Relations at a Micro-Ecological Scale
title_sort understanding how and why spatial segregation endures a systematic review of recent research on intergroup relations at a micro ecological scale
url https://spb.psychopen.eu/article/33482/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT leonorbettencourt understandinghowandwhyspatialsegregationenduresasystematicreviewofrecentresearchonintergrouprelationsatamicroecologicalscale
AT johndixon understandinghowandwhyspatialsegregationenduresasystematicreviewofrecentresearchonintergrouprelationsatamicroecologicalscale
AT paulacastro understandinghowandwhyspatialsegregationenduresasystematicreviewofrecentresearchonintergrouprelationsatamicroecologicalscale