The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial

Abstract Aim The main treatment strategy in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS1) is vascular decongestion. It is probable that sequential blockage of the renal tubule with combined diuretics (CD) will obtain similar benefits compared with stepped-dose furosemide (SF). Methods In a pilot double-blind r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Sergio Sánchez-Villaseca, Gregorio Romero-González, Jorge J. Font-Yañez, Andrés De la Torre-Quiroga, Andrés Aranda-G de Quevedo, Alexia Romero-Muñóz, Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera, Gael Chávez-Alonso, Juan Gómez-Fregoso, Guillermo García-García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02637-y
_version_ 1828146313562161152
author Jonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez
Miguel Ibarra-Estrada
Sergio Sánchez-Villaseca
Gregorio Romero-González
Jorge J. Font-Yañez
Andrés De la Torre-Quiroga
Andrés Aranda-G de Quevedo
Alexia Romero-Muñóz
Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera
Gael Chávez-Alonso
Juan Gómez-Fregoso
Guillermo García-García
author_facet Jonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez
Miguel Ibarra-Estrada
Sergio Sánchez-Villaseca
Gregorio Romero-González
Jorge J. Font-Yañez
Andrés De la Torre-Quiroga
Andrés Aranda-G de Quevedo
Alexia Romero-Muñóz
Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera
Gael Chávez-Alonso
Juan Gómez-Fregoso
Guillermo García-García
author_sort Jonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim The main treatment strategy in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS1) is vascular decongestion. It is probable that sequential blockage of the renal tubule with combined diuretics (CD) will obtain similar benefits compared with stepped-dose furosemide (SF). Methods In a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial of CRS1 patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to SF or CD. The SF group received a continuous infusion of furosemide 100 mg during the first day, with daily incremental doses to 200 mg, 300 mg and 400 mg. The CD group received a combination of diuretics, including 4 consecutive days of oral chlorthalidone 50 mg, spironolactone 50 mg and infusion of furosemide 100 mg. The objectives were to assess renal function recovery and variables associated with vascular decongestion. Results From July 2017 to February 2020, 80 patients were randomized, 40 to the SF and 40 to the CD group. Groups were similar at baseline and had several very high-risk features. Their mean age was 59 ± 14.5 years, there were 37 men (46.2%). The primary endpoint occurred in 20% of the SF group and 15.2% of the DC group (p = 0.49). All secondary and exploratory endpoints were similar between groups. Adverse events occurred frequently (85%) with no differences between groups (p = 0.53). Conclusion In patients with CRS1 and a high risk of resistance to diuretics, the use of CD compared to SF offers the same results in renal recovery, diuresis, vascular decongestion and adverse events, and it can be considered an alternative treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT04393493 on 19/05/2020 retrospectively registered.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5368bb92c1e4f769f8f27388aed91ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:35Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-c5368bb92c1e4f769f8f27388aed91ee2022-12-22T04:04:04ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692022-01-012311910.1186/s12882-021-02637-yThe Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized TrialJonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez0Miguel Ibarra-Estrada1Sergio Sánchez-Villaseca2Gregorio Romero-González3Jorge J. Font-Yañez4Andrés De la Torre-Quiroga5Andrés Aranda-G de Quevedo6Alexia Romero-Muñóz7Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera8Gael Chávez-Alonso9Juan Gómez-Fregoso10Guillermo García-García11Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeUnidad de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeDepartamento de Nefrología, Clínica Universidad de NavarraServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud CUCSServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio AlcaldeAbstract Aim The main treatment strategy in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS1) is vascular decongestion. It is probable that sequential blockage of the renal tubule with combined diuretics (CD) will obtain similar benefits compared with stepped-dose furosemide (SF). Methods In a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial of CRS1 patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to SF or CD. The SF group received a continuous infusion of furosemide 100 mg during the first day, with daily incremental doses to 200 mg, 300 mg and 400 mg. The CD group received a combination of diuretics, including 4 consecutive days of oral chlorthalidone 50 mg, spironolactone 50 mg and infusion of furosemide 100 mg. The objectives were to assess renal function recovery and variables associated with vascular decongestion. Results From July 2017 to February 2020, 80 patients were randomized, 40 to the SF and 40 to the CD group. Groups were similar at baseline and had several very high-risk features. Their mean age was 59 ± 14.5 years, there were 37 men (46.2%). The primary endpoint occurred in 20% of the SF group and 15.2% of the DC group (p = 0.49). All secondary and exploratory endpoints were similar between groups. Adverse events occurred frequently (85%) with no differences between groups (p = 0.53). Conclusion In patients with CRS1 and a high risk of resistance to diuretics, the use of CD compared to SF offers the same results in renal recovery, diuresis, vascular decongestion and adverse events, and it can be considered an alternative treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT04393493 on 19/05/2020 retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02637-yAcute kidney injuryCardio-renal syndromeCongestive heart failureDiureticsDiuresis
spellingShingle Jonathan S. Chávez-Iñiguez
Miguel Ibarra-Estrada
Sergio Sánchez-Villaseca
Gregorio Romero-González
Jorge J. Font-Yañez
Andrés De la Torre-Quiroga
Andrés Aranda-G de Quevedo
Alexia Romero-Muñóz
Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera
Gael Chávez-Alonso
Juan Gómez-Fregoso
Guillermo García-García
The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
BMC Nephrology
Acute kidney injury
Cardio-renal syndrome
Congestive heart failure
Diuretics
Diuresis
title The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
title_full The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
title_fullStr The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
title_short The Effect in Renal Function and Vascular Decongestion in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated with Two Strategies of Diuretics, a Pilot Randomized Trial
title_sort effect in renal function and vascular decongestion in type 1 cardiorenal syndrome treated with two strategies of diuretics a pilot randomized trial
topic Acute kidney injury
Cardio-renal syndrome
Congestive heart failure
Diuretics
Diuresis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02637-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanschaveziniguez theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT miguelibarraestrada theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT sergiosanchezvillaseca theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT gregorioromerogonzalez theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT jorgejfontyanez theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT andresdelatorrequiroga theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT andresarandagdequevedo theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT alexiaromeromunoz theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT pablomaggianiaguilera theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT gaelchavezalonso theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT juangomezfregoso theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT guillermogarciagarcia theeffectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT jonathanschaveziniguez effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT miguelibarraestrada effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT sergiosanchezvillaseca effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT gregorioromerogonzalez effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT jorgejfontyanez effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT andresdelatorrequiroga effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT andresarandagdequevedo effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT alexiaromeromunoz effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT pablomaggianiaguilera effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT gaelchavezalonso effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT juangomezfregoso effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial
AT guillermogarciagarcia effectinrenalfunctionandvasculardecongestionintype1cardiorenalsyndrometreatedwithtwostrategiesofdiureticsapilotrandomizedtrial