Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli

This paper focuses on the so-called rhetorical interrogatives in English, in order to show how the tools of Antoine Culioli’s Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO) can help to improve their description and characterisation. First, I discuss some definitions and criteria traditional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bénédicte Guillaume
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4270
_version_ 1797311205895831552
author Bénédicte Guillaume
author_facet Bénédicte Guillaume
author_sort Bénédicte Guillaume
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the so-called rhetorical interrogatives in English, in order to show how the tools of Antoine Culioli’s Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO) can help to improve their description and characterisation. First, I discuss some definitions and criteria traditionally highlighted to identify rhetorical interrogatives, which are syntactically ambiguous with standard interrogatives, and also examine the way in which A. Culioli defines the interrogative modality as well as the operation of scanning, which are closely intertwined with each other. A typology of the rhetorical interrogatives in English, comprising three main categories, is then put forward. The common, factor between these categories is the fact that the scanning operation normally triggered by the recourse to a subject / auxiliary (or subject / verb) inversion, or the presence of a WH- marker, is prevented insofar as the speaker has already selected an answer.My typology is thus based on three distinct ways of providing an outlet for the scanning operation brought about by the recourse to interrogative markers, which account for the differences between each of the categories postulated. These various outcomes are pre-constructed by the speaker, so that the addressee should not voice their opinion, despite their apparent inclusion by means of the interrogative form. I also examine some examples in which such a strategy is ultimately undermined by the addressee, who feels free to express their opinion, despite the attempt by the speaker to suppress their point of view. This study is based on a personal corpus of unsolicited attested examples of British or American English, taken from novels or from recent films and series.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T01:55:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5415138d2944639ab071b94a5902193
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T01:55:16Z
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Anglophonia
spelling doaj.art-c5415138d2944639ab071b94a59021932024-02-14T09:08:29ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04663110.4000/anglophonia.4270Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine CulioliBénédicte GuillaumeThis paper focuses on the so-called rhetorical interrogatives in English, in order to show how the tools of Antoine Culioli’s Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO) can help to improve their description and characterisation. First, I discuss some definitions and criteria traditionally highlighted to identify rhetorical interrogatives, which are syntactically ambiguous with standard interrogatives, and also examine the way in which A. Culioli defines the interrogative modality as well as the operation of scanning, which are closely intertwined with each other. A typology of the rhetorical interrogatives in English, comprising three main categories, is then put forward. The common, factor between these categories is the fact that the scanning operation normally triggered by the recourse to a subject / auxiliary (or subject / verb) inversion, or the presence of a WH- marker, is prevented insofar as the speaker has already selected an answer.My typology is thus based on three distinct ways of providing an outlet for the scanning operation brought about by the recourse to interrogative markers, which account for the differences between each of the categories postulated. These various outcomes are pre-constructed by the speaker, so that the addressee should not voice their opinion, despite their apparent inclusion by means of the interrogative form. I also examine some examples in which such a strategy is ultimately undermined by the addressee, who feels free to express their opinion, despite the attempt by the speaker to suppress their point of view. This study is based on a personal corpus of unsolicited attested examples of British or American English, taken from novels or from recent films and series.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4270EnglishTheory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO)rhetorical questioninterrogationscanning operationsyntactic ambiguity
spellingShingle Bénédicte Guillaume
Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
Anglophonia
English
Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO)
rhetorical question
interrogation
scanning operation
syntactic ambiguity
title Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
title_full Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
title_fullStr Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
title_full_unstemmed Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
title_short Les interrogatives dites rhétoriques au prisme de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli
title_sort les interrogatives dites rhetoriques au prisme de la theorie d antoine culioli
topic English
Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations (TEPO)
rhetorical question
interrogation
scanning operation
syntactic ambiguity
url https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/4270
work_keys_str_mv AT benedicteguillaume lesinterrogativesditesrhetoriquesauprismedelatheoriedantoineculioli