Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX
Numerical modelling of hydromechanical processes in geological environments has become an invaluable tool in understanding and predicting system behaviour. However, due to the different algorithms and numerical schemes implemented in the different models, model reliability may vary considerably. Mod...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/65/e3sconf_icegt2020_02002.pdf |
_version_ | 1819052870967754752 |
---|---|
author | Zhou Dejian Tatomir Alexandru Tomac Ingrid Sauter Martin |
author_facet | Zhou Dejian Tatomir Alexandru Tomac Ingrid Sauter Martin |
author_sort | Zhou Dejian |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Numerical modelling of hydromechanical processes in geological environments has become an invaluable tool in understanding and predicting system behaviour. However, due to the different algorithms and numerical schemes implemented in the different models, model reliability may vary considerably. Modelling of single- and multi-phase flow in porous media has been widely employed in various engineering applications such as geological disposal of nuclear waste, geological storage of carbon dioxide, high-temperature geothermal systems, or hydraulic fracturing for shale gas exploitation. Coupled hydro-mechanical (H-M) processes play a key role in the prediction of the behaviour of geological reservoirs during their development and testing operations. In this paper, we present a benchmark test on a single-phase flow problem in a hydrogeological reservoir with 5 horizontal layers of different properties. The aim is to compare two hydromechanical (H-M) models that use a vertex-centred finite-volume discretization and a finite element discretization. The first model is constructed with the free-open source simulator DuMuX, and the second with the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics. The verification study suggests general confidence in the model reliability, but also highlights and discusses several areas of discrepancies between two models. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:26:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c5427b90e5ae4f16b47c00f7ff68dcb9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2267-1242 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:26:43Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | E3S Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj.art-c5427b90e5ae4f16b47c00f7ff68dcb92022-12-21T19:04:09ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-012050200210.1051/e3sconf/202020502002e3sconf_icegt2020_02002Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuXZhou Dejian0Tatomir AlexandruTomac Ingrid1Sauter Martin2Department of Applied GeologyStructural Engineering Department, University of California San DiegoDepartment of Applied GeologyNumerical modelling of hydromechanical processes in geological environments has become an invaluable tool in understanding and predicting system behaviour. However, due to the different algorithms and numerical schemes implemented in the different models, model reliability may vary considerably. Modelling of single- and multi-phase flow in porous media has been widely employed in various engineering applications such as geological disposal of nuclear waste, geological storage of carbon dioxide, high-temperature geothermal systems, or hydraulic fracturing for shale gas exploitation. Coupled hydro-mechanical (H-M) processes play a key role in the prediction of the behaviour of geological reservoirs during their development and testing operations. In this paper, we present a benchmark test on a single-phase flow problem in a hydrogeological reservoir with 5 horizontal layers of different properties. The aim is to compare two hydromechanical (H-M) models that use a vertex-centred finite-volume discretization and a finite element discretization. The first model is constructed with the free-open source simulator DuMuX, and the second with the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics. The verification study suggests general confidence in the model reliability, but also highlights and discusses several areas of discrepancies between two models.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/65/e3sconf_icegt2020_02002.pdf |
spellingShingle | Zhou Dejian Tatomir Alexandru Tomac Ingrid Sauter Martin Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX E3S Web of Conferences |
title | Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX |
title_full | Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX |
title_fullStr | Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX |
title_full_unstemmed | Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX |
title_short | Verification benchmark for a single-phase flow hydro - mechanical model comparison between COMSOL Multiphysics and DuMuX |
title_sort | verification benchmark for a single phase flow hydro mechanical model comparison between comsol multiphysics and dumux |
url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/65/e3sconf_icegt2020_02002.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoudejian verificationbenchmarkforasinglephaseflowhydromechanicalmodelcomparisonbetweencomsolmultiphysicsanddumux AT tatomiralexandru verificationbenchmarkforasinglephaseflowhydromechanicalmodelcomparisonbetweencomsolmultiphysicsanddumux AT tomacingrid verificationbenchmarkforasinglephaseflowhydromechanicalmodelcomparisonbetweencomsolmultiphysicsanddumux AT sautermartin verificationbenchmarkforasinglephaseflowhydromechanicalmodelcomparisonbetweencomsolmultiphysicsanddumux |