Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920
Gaining international recognition for the White Movement was the most important foreign policy task of the Russian non–Bolshevik diplomacy. The article traces the evolving discourse of career diplomats considering this issue at different stages of the civil war. It shows their deep patriotism, profe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3320 |
| _version_ | 1797321721153323008 |
|---|---|
| author | E. M. Mironova |
| author_facet | E. M. Mironova |
| author_sort | E. M. Mironova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Gaining international recognition for the White Movement was the most important foreign policy task of the Russian non–Bolshevik diplomacy. The article traces the evolving discourse of career diplomats considering this issue at different stages of the civil war. It shows their deep patriotism, professionalism, and persistency in carrying out the task. However, when the allies did not share the slogans of the White Movement, the possibilities for finding common ground were very limited. At the first stage (summer-autumn 1918), diplomats were cautious about the claims for recognition of numerous Russian non–Bolshevik governments. In the second stage (1918 – 1919), the issue of recognition played a unique role – participation of Russian representatives in the peace conference, and therefore in determining the configuration of the post-war world, depended on its success. The resolve of the diplomats to defend the Russia’s national interests did not suit foreign powers, who did not share the movement's slogan about restoring a united and indivisible Russia, its power, and its position in the world. At the third stage (spring-summer 1920), diplomats, loosing hope for military victory of the White Movement in the civil war, withdrew from the direct involvement in seeking international recognition for the Movement. However, they provided all possible technical support to the head of the Department of External Relations of the Wrangel Government, Peter B. Struve, who assumed this mission. France's recognition of the Sevastopol authorities in the summer of 1920 was limited, did not involve active military assistance, and caused justified skepticism in diplomatic circles. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T05:03:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c54c01abbc6e474f99af2207b71707ca |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2071-8160 2541-9099 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T05:03:45Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| spelling | doaj.art-c54c01abbc6e474f99af2207b71707ca2024-02-07T10:17:10ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992023-03-01161528610.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-52-862516Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920E. M. Mironova0Institute of world history RASGaining international recognition for the White Movement was the most important foreign policy task of the Russian non–Bolshevik diplomacy. The article traces the evolving discourse of career diplomats considering this issue at different stages of the civil war. It shows their deep patriotism, professionalism, and persistency in carrying out the task. However, when the allies did not share the slogans of the White Movement, the possibilities for finding common ground were very limited. At the first stage (summer-autumn 1918), diplomats were cautious about the claims for recognition of numerous Russian non–Bolshevik governments. In the second stage (1918 – 1919), the issue of recognition played a unique role – participation of Russian representatives in the peace conference, and therefore in determining the configuration of the post-war world, depended on its success. The resolve of the diplomats to defend the Russia’s national interests did not suit foreign powers, who did not share the movement's slogan about restoring a united and indivisible Russia, its power, and its position in the world. At the third stage (spring-summer 1920), diplomats, loosing hope for military victory of the White Movement in the civil war, withdrew from the direct involvement in seeking international recognition for the Movement. However, they provided all possible technical support to the head of the Department of External Relations of the Wrangel Government, Peter B. Struve, who assumed this mission. France's recognition of the Sevastopol authorities in the summer of 1920 was limited, did not involve active military assistance, and caused justified skepticism in diplomatic circles.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3320russian foreign diplomatic corpsalliess.d. sazonovp.b. struvev.a. maklakovm.n. giеrs. |
| spellingShingle | E. M. Mironova Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta russian foreign diplomatic corps allies s.d. sazonov p.b. struve v.a. maklakov m.n. giеrs. |
| title | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 |
| title_full | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 |
| title_fullStr | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 |
| title_short | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920 |
| title_sort | russian non bolshevik diplomacy and the issue of international recognition of the white movement in 1918 1920 |
| topic | russian foreign diplomatic corps allies s.d. sazonov p.b. struve v.a. maklakov m.n. giеrs. |
| url | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3320 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emmironova russiannonbolshevikdiplomacyandtheissueofinternationalrecognitionofthewhitemovementin19181920 |