Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus
This survey study aimed to examine the efficiency of a mentoring software used for e-mentoring Iranian EFL teachers by investigating (1) if the application of the mentoring software vs. traditional mentoring made any difference in the instructors' methodology of teaching writing and (2) the att...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| Online Access: | https://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/issue_360_361.html?lang=en |
| _version_ | 1798030010159726592 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahmad Beigi Rizi Hossein Barati Ahmad MoeinZadeh |
| author_facet | Ahmad Beigi Rizi Hossein Barati Ahmad MoeinZadeh |
| author_sort | Ahmad Beigi Rizi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This survey study aimed to examine the efficiency of a mentoring software used for e-mentoring Iranian EFL teachers by investigating (1) if the application of the mentoring software vs. traditional mentoring made any difference in the instructors' methodology of teaching writing and (2) the attitudes of the users towards the application of the mentoring software. In so doing, traditional mentoring and software mentoring were used for mentoring three groups of Iranian EFL teachers (N=30) teaching writing to three groups of learners. The teachers for Group 1 were mentored through traditional mentoring, the teachers for Group 2 were mentored through e-mentoring software and the teachers for Group 3 -the control group- received no mentoring treatment at all. The results of the observation checklists demonstrated that the mentoring style of the teachers in Group 2 had better instructors' methodology of teaching writing on average (G1: 18.16, G2: 57.8, G3: 14.13) and the results of the survey on the opinions of the users towards the application of the mentoring software through a close-ended questionnaire (the total average of mean score: 3.355) showed positive attitudes. The study concluded that the outcome of the application of the mentoring software was effective and helped EFL teachers match the mentoring process of the teachers in Group 2 by better results in comparison to traditional mentoring. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:34:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c555d37f034643a2b4f2be6f8c368561 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2676-5357 2676-5357 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:34:30Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-c555d37f034643a2b4f2be6f8c3685612022-12-22T04:06:55ZengImam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies2676-53572676-53572021-06-018113010.30479/jmrels.2020.12159.1512Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focusAhmad Beigi Rizi 0Hossein Barati1 Ahmad MoeinZadeh2 English Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of IsfahanEnglish Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan The Department of Foreign Languages, English Language Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan This survey study aimed to examine the efficiency of a mentoring software used for e-mentoring Iranian EFL teachers by investigating (1) if the application of the mentoring software vs. traditional mentoring made any difference in the instructors' methodology of teaching writing and (2) the attitudes of the users towards the application of the mentoring software. In so doing, traditional mentoring and software mentoring were used for mentoring three groups of Iranian EFL teachers (N=30) teaching writing to three groups of learners. The teachers for Group 1 were mentored through traditional mentoring, the teachers for Group 2 were mentored through e-mentoring software and the teachers for Group 3 -the control group- received no mentoring treatment at all. The results of the observation checklists demonstrated that the mentoring style of the teachers in Group 2 had better instructors' methodology of teaching writing on average (G1: 18.16, G2: 57.8, G3: 14.13) and the results of the survey on the opinions of the users towards the application of the mentoring software through a close-ended questionnaire (the total average of mean score: 3.355) showed positive attitudes. The study concluded that the outcome of the application of the mentoring software was effective and helped EFL teachers match the mentoring process of the teachers in Group 2 by better results in comparison to traditional mentoring.https://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/issue_360_361.html?lang=en |
| spellingShingle | Ahmad Beigi Rizi Hossein Barati Ahmad MoeinZadeh Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
| title | Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus |
| title_full | Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus |
| title_fullStr | Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus |
| title_short | Cross-examining e-mentoring vs. face-to-face mentoring: The performance and attitudes of the Iranian EFL teachers in focus |
| title_sort | cross examining e mentoring vs face to face mentoring the performance and attitudes of the iranian efl teachers in focus |
| url | https://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/issue_360_361.html?lang=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadbeigirizi crossexaminingementoringvsfacetofacementoringtheperformanceandattitudesoftheiranianeflteachersinfocus AT hosseinbarati crossexaminingementoringvsfacetofacementoringtheperformanceandattitudesoftheiranianeflteachersinfocus AT ahmadmoeinzadeh crossexaminingementoringvsfacetofacementoringtheperformanceandattitudesoftheiranianeflteachersinfocus |