Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties
Abstract Background Internal and external validity are the most relevant components when critically appraising randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for systematic reviews. However, there is no gold standard to assess external validity. This might be related to the heterogeneity of the terminology as...
Main Authors: | Andres Jung, Julia Balzer, Tobias Braun, Kerstin Luedtke |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01561-5 |
Similar Items
-
Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported?
by: Anja Maria Brænd, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Applicability of evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to clinical practice: A conceptual review
by: Antti Malmivaara
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Under-representation of key demographic groups in opioid use disorder trials
by: Kara E. Rudolph, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Lipid‐Lowering Trials Are Not Representative of Patients Managed in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Exclusion Criteria
by: Martina Aeschbacher‐Germann, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Comparing clinical trial population representativeness to real-world users of 17 biologics approved for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An external validity analysis of 66,639 biologic users from the Italian VALORE project
by: Ylenia Ingrasciotta, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)