Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control

Despite the advances in surgical and cell therapy regenerative techniques for cartilage repair, the challenge is to overcome an inferior fibrocartilage repair tissue. In vitro, TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 are the primary growth factors employed to induce chondrogenic differentiation. However, the clinical app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boushra Ajeeb, Michael Detamore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913123000365
_version_ 1797732886317629440
author Boushra Ajeeb
Michael Detamore
author_facet Boushra Ajeeb
Michael Detamore
author_sort Boushra Ajeeb
collection DOAJ
description Despite the advances in surgical and cell therapy regenerative techniques for cartilage repair, the challenge is to overcome an inferior fibrocartilage repair tissue. In vitro, TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 are the primary growth factors employed to induce chondrogenic differentiation. However, the clinical application of native proteins may present challenges regarding stability, cost, or reproducibility. Therefore, there remains an unmet clinical need for the identification of small chondroinductive synthetic molecules. From the literature, two peptides—CM10 and CK2.1—appear to be promising candidates; however, they have not been directly compared to TGF-β with human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs). Similarly, two promising compounds—kartogenin and SM04690—have been reported in the literature to exhibit chondroinductive potential in vivo and in vitro; however, kartogenin was not directly compared against TGF-β. In the current study, we evaluated the chondroinductive potential of CM10, CK2.1, kartogenin, and SM04690, and directly compared them to each other and to a TGF-β3 positive control. Following 21 days of culture, none of the evaluated chondrogenic factors, either individually or even in combinations of two, resulted in a higher gene expression of chondrogenic markers as compared to TGF-β3. Additionally, no collagen II gene expression was detected except in the TGF-β3 positive control group. Given that the evaluated factors have confirmed efficacy in the literature, but not in the current study with a positive control, there may be value in the future identification of new chondroinductive factors that are less situation-dependent, with rigorous evaluations of their effect on chondrogenesis using positive controls.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:20:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c56eb838a58b492693c360e0c9552a5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2665-9131
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:20:00Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
spelling doaj.art-c56eb838a58b492693c360e0c9552a5f2023-08-30T05:54:47ZengElsevierOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open2665-91312023-09-0153100369Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive controlBoushra Ajeeb0Michael Detamore1Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USACorresponding author. University of Oklahoma, 101 David L Boren Blvd, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.; Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USADespite the advances in surgical and cell therapy regenerative techniques for cartilage repair, the challenge is to overcome an inferior fibrocartilage repair tissue. In vitro, TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 are the primary growth factors employed to induce chondrogenic differentiation. However, the clinical application of native proteins may present challenges regarding stability, cost, or reproducibility. Therefore, there remains an unmet clinical need for the identification of small chondroinductive synthetic molecules. From the literature, two peptides—CM10 and CK2.1—appear to be promising candidates; however, they have not been directly compared to TGF-β with human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs). Similarly, two promising compounds—kartogenin and SM04690—have been reported in the literature to exhibit chondroinductive potential in vivo and in vitro; however, kartogenin was not directly compared against TGF-β. In the current study, we evaluated the chondroinductive potential of CM10, CK2.1, kartogenin, and SM04690, and directly compared them to each other and to a TGF-β3 positive control. Following 21 days of culture, none of the evaluated chondrogenic factors, either individually or even in combinations of two, resulted in a higher gene expression of chondrogenic markers as compared to TGF-β3. Additionally, no collagen II gene expression was detected except in the TGF-β3 positive control group. Given that the evaluated factors have confirmed efficacy in the literature, but not in the current study with a positive control, there may be value in the future identification of new chondroinductive factors that are less situation-dependent, with rigorous evaluations of their effect on chondrogenesis using positive controls.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913123000365Cartilage regenerationChondroinductive peptidesChondrogenesis
spellingShingle Boushra Ajeeb
Michael Detamore
Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Cartilage regeneration
Chondroinductive peptides
Chondrogenesis
title Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
title_full Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
title_fullStr Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
title_short Comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a TGF-β positive control
title_sort comparison of multiple synthetic chondroinductive factors in pellet culture against a tgf β positive control
topic Cartilage regeneration
Chondroinductive peptides
Chondrogenesis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913123000365
work_keys_str_mv AT boushraajeeb comparisonofmultiplesyntheticchondroinductivefactorsinpelletcultureagainstatgfbpositivecontrol
AT michaeldetamore comparisonofmultiplesyntheticchondroinductivefactorsinpelletcultureagainstatgfbpositivecontrol