Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Responses to Four Different Generation Bioresorbable Materials-Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA), Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid (u-HA/PLLA) and Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (u-HA/PLLA/PGA) in Maxillofacial Surgery: An In-Vivo Animal Study

Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Responses to Four Different Generation Bioresorbable Materials-Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA), Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid (u-HA/PLLA) and Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid/Polyglycolic Acid (u-HA/PLLA/PGA) in Maxillofacial Surgery: An In-Vivo Animal Study

Bone stabilization using osteosynthesis devices is essential in maxillofacial surgery. Owing to numerous disadvantages, bioresorbable materials are preferred over titanium for osteofixation in certain procedures. The biomaterials used for osteosynthesis in maxillofacial surgery have been subdivided...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kentaro Ayasaka, Mrunalini Ramanathan, Ngo Xuan Huy, Ankhtsetseg Shijirbold, Tatsuo Okui, Hiroto Tatsumi, Tatsuhito Kotani, Yukiho Shimamura, Reon Morioka, Takahiro Kanno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
osteosynthesis device
bioactive osteoconductivity
bioresorbable material
maxillofacial surgery
bone regeneration
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/23/7379

Similar Items

Similar Items