Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeThis study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological results of contralateral indirect decompression through minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).Overview of LiteratureSeveral studies have proposed that blood lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang-Hyuk Min, Jae-Sung Yoo, Jun-Yeul Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2014-08-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-453.pdf
_version_ 1819291132755968000
author Sang-Hyuk Min
Jae-Sung Yoo
Jun-Yeul Lee
author_facet Sang-Hyuk Min
Jae-Sung Yoo
Jun-Yeul Lee
author_sort Sang-Hyuk Min
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeThis study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological results of contralateral indirect decompression through minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).Overview of LiteratureSeveral studies have proposed that blood loss and operation time could be reduced through a unilateral approach, although many surgeons have forecast that satisfactory foraminal decompression is difficult to achieve through a unilateral approach.MethodsThe study included 30 subjects who had undergone single-level MI-TLIF. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were analyzed for clinical assessment. Disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis angle were examined for radiological assessment. The degree of contralateral indirect decompression was evaluated through a comparative analysis, with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed preoperatively and at one year postoperatively.ResultsIntraoperative blood loss volume was 308.75 mL in the unilateral approach group (UAP), and 575.00 mL in the bilateral approach group (BAP), showing a statistically significant difference. Operation time was 139.50 minutes in the UAP group, and 189.00 minutes in the BAP group, exhibiting a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). On the other hand, no significant difference was found in VAS, ODI, disc height, lordosis angles and the degree of nerve decompression in the vertebral foramen, using MRI, between the two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionsSatisfactory results were acquired with MI-TLIF conducted through the unilateral approach of contralateral indirect decompression, in alignment with the bilateral approach. Therefore, contralateral indirect decompression is thought to be a useful procedure in reducing the operation time and volume of blood loss.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T03:33:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5755a9e164b411ea74f22cc4e3e2c4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T03:33:47Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-c5755a9e164b411ea74f22cc4e3e2c4c2022-12-21T17:17:07ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462014-08-018445346110.4184/asj.2014.8.4.453648Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionSang-Hyuk Min0Jae-Sung Yoo1Jun-Yeul Lee2Department of Othopedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.Department of Othopedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.Department of Othopedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeThis study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological results of contralateral indirect decompression through minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).Overview of LiteratureSeveral studies have proposed that blood loss and operation time could be reduced through a unilateral approach, although many surgeons have forecast that satisfactory foraminal decompression is difficult to achieve through a unilateral approach.MethodsThe study included 30 subjects who had undergone single-level MI-TLIF. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were analyzed for clinical assessment. Disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis angle were examined for radiological assessment. The degree of contralateral indirect decompression was evaluated through a comparative analysis, with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed preoperatively and at one year postoperatively.ResultsIntraoperative blood loss volume was 308.75 mL in the unilateral approach group (UAP), and 575.00 mL in the bilateral approach group (BAP), showing a statistically significant difference. Operation time was 139.50 minutes in the UAP group, and 189.00 minutes in the BAP group, exhibiting a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). On the other hand, no significant difference was found in VAS, ODI, disc height, lordosis angles and the degree of nerve decompression in the vertebral foramen, using MRI, between the two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionsSatisfactory results were acquired with MI-TLIF conducted through the unilateral approach of contralateral indirect decompression, in alignment with the bilateral approach. Therefore, contralateral indirect decompression is thought to be a useful procedure in reducing the operation time and volume of blood loss.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-453.pdfSpinal fusionSurgical procedures, Minimally invasiveUnilateral approach
spellingShingle Sang-Hyuk Min
Jae-Sung Yoo
Jun-Yeul Lee
Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Asian Spine Journal
Spinal fusion
Surgical procedures, Minimally invasive
Unilateral approach
title Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_short Usefulness of Contralateral Indirect Decompression through Minimally Invasive Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_sort usefulness of contralateral indirect decompression through minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
topic Spinal fusion
Surgical procedures, Minimally invasive
Unilateral approach
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-8-453.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sanghyukmin usefulnessofcontralateralindirectdecompressionthroughminimallyinvasiveunilateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT jaesungyoo usefulnessofcontralateralindirectdecompressionthroughminimallyinvasiveunilateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT junyeullee usefulnessofcontralateralindirectdecompressionthroughminimallyinvasiveunilateraltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion