Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier
Abstract To correctly manage the road infrastructure before and after an earthquake, it is necessary to estimate and even predict the seismic performance of the bridge. The quantification of the bridge's seismic performance response was present in terms of displacement and also based on previou...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Bridge Engineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00095-0 |
| _version_ | 1827709272392204288 |
|---|---|
| author | Javier F. Taipe Victor I. Fernandez-Davila |
| author_facet | Javier F. Taipe Victor I. Fernandez-Davila |
| author_sort | Javier F. Taipe |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract To correctly manage the road infrastructure before and after an earthquake, it is necessary to estimate and even predict the seismic performance of the bridge. The quantification of the bridge's seismic performance response was present in terms of displacement and also based on previous research of reinforced concrete bridge pier models. The displacement did define from a force lateral-displacement response diagram corresponding to the capacity curve, calculated through a non-linear static pushover analysis of the reinforced concrete bridge pier model for each limit state, from intact state to collapse. Thus, six defined displacements correspond to the cracking displacement, the yielding displacement, the spalling displacement, the crushing displacement, the buckling displacement, and the fracturing displacement. The six defined limit states correspond to the cracking limit state, the yielding limit state, the spalling limit state, the crushing limit state, the buckling limit state, and the fracturing limit state. Also, parametric analysis did carry out to evaluate the influence, relative importance, and trend of the input parameters in response to the seismic performance of the reinforced concrete bridge pier model. Eleven input parameters did analyze as the concrete compressive strength, the yield stress of reinforcing steel, the concrete cover thickness, the pier aspect ratio, the configuration of the transverse reinforcement, the spacing of the transverse reinforcing steel, the transversal diameter of the transverse reinforcing steel, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the transversal diameter of the longitudinal reinforcing steel, the axial load ratio, and coefficient of subgrade reaction. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T17:19:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c57e933021e0469fa240f80cdc40cc29 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2662-5407 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T17:19:37Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Bridge Engineering |
| spelling | doaj.art-c57e933021e0469fa240f80cdc40cc292023-11-20T10:24:26ZengSpringerOpenAdvances in Bridge Engineering2662-54072023-08-014112510.1186/s43251-023-00095-0Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pierJavier F. Taipe0Victor I. Fernandez-Davila1Graduate School, Pontifical Catholic University of PeruFaculty of Civil Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of PeruAbstract To correctly manage the road infrastructure before and after an earthquake, it is necessary to estimate and even predict the seismic performance of the bridge. The quantification of the bridge's seismic performance response was present in terms of displacement and also based on previous research of reinforced concrete bridge pier models. The displacement did define from a force lateral-displacement response diagram corresponding to the capacity curve, calculated through a non-linear static pushover analysis of the reinforced concrete bridge pier model for each limit state, from intact state to collapse. Thus, six defined displacements correspond to the cracking displacement, the yielding displacement, the spalling displacement, the crushing displacement, the buckling displacement, and the fracturing displacement. The six defined limit states correspond to the cracking limit state, the yielding limit state, the spalling limit state, the crushing limit state, the buckling limit state, and the fracturing limit state. Also, parametric analysis did carry out to evaluate the influence, relative importance, and trend of the input parameters in response to the seismic performance of the reinforced concrete bridge pier model. Eleven input parameters did analyze as the concrete compressive strength, the yield stress of reinforcing steel, the concrete cover thickness, the pier aspect ratio, the configuration of the transverse reinforcement, the spacing of the transverse reinforcing steel, the transversal diameter of the transverse reinforcing steel, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the transversal diameter of the longitudinal reinforcing steel, the axial load ratio, and coefficient of subgrade reaction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00095-0Response of the seismic performanceCapacity curvePushover analysisReinforced concrete bridge pier modelLimit statesInput parameter |
| spellingShingle | Javier F. Taipe Victor I. Fernandez-Davila Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier Advances in Bridge Engineering Response of the seismic performance Capacity curve Pushover analysis Reinforced concrete bridge pier model Limit states Input parameter |
| title | Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier |
| title_full | Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier |
| title_fullStr | Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier |
| title_full_unstemmed | Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier |
| title_short | Displacement-based seismic performance of RC bridge pier |
| title_sort | displacement based seismic performance of rc bridge pier |
| topic | Response of the seismic performance Capacity curve Pushover analysis Reinforced concrete bridge pier model Limit states Input parameter |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00095-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT javierftaipe displacementbasedseismicperformanceofrcbridgepier AT victorifernandezdavila displacementbasedseismicperformanceofrcbridgepier |