Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines

The following study investigates the effectiveness of a deep learning-based method for predicting the flow field and flow-driven rotation of a vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbine operating in previously unseen free-stream velocities. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained and tested using th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chloë Dorge, Eric Louis Bibeau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1130
_version_ 1797624775080673280
author Chloë Dorge
Eric Louis Bibeau
author_facet Chloë Dorge
Eric Louis Bibeau
author_sort Chloë Dorge
collection DOAJ
description The following study investigates the effectiveness of a deep learning-based method for predicting the flow field and flow-driven rotation of a vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbine operating in previously unseen free-stream velocities. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained and tested using the solutions of five two-dimensional (2-D), foil-resolved Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations, with free-stream velocities of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 m/s. Based on the boundary conditions of free-stream velocity and rotor position, the flow fields of x-velocity, y-velocity, pressure, and turbulent viscosity are inferred, in addition to the angular velocity of the rotor. Three trained CNN models are developed to evaluate the effects of (1) the dimensions of the training data, and (2) the number of simulations used as training cases. Reducing data dimensions was found to diminish mean relative error in predictions of velocity and turbulent viscosity, while increasing it in predictions of pressure and angular velocity. Increasing the number of training cases from two to three was found to reduce relative error for all predicted unknowns. With the best achieved CNN model, the variables of x-velocity, y-velocity, pressure, turbulent viscosity, and angular velocity were inferred with mean relative errors of 6.93%, 9.82%, 10.7%, 7.48%, and 0.817%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:47:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c58dd6397d9c4705a35d64fc9d4d32ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:47:15Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-c58dd6397d9c4705a35d64fc9d4d32ee2023-11-16T16:33:12ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-01-01163113010.3390/en16031130Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis TurbinesChloë Dorge0Eric Louis Bibeau1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, 75 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, 75 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, CanadaThe following study investigates the effectiveness of a deep learning-based method for predicting the flow field and flow-driven rotation of a vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbine operating in previously unseen free-stream velocities. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained and tested using the solutions of five two-dimensional (2-D), foil-resolved Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations, with free-stream velocities of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 m/s. Based on the boundary conditions of free-stream velocity and rotor position, the flow fields of x-velocity, y-velocity, pressure, and turbulent viscosity are inferred, in addition to the angular velocity of the rotor. Three trained CNN models are developed to evaluate the effects of (1) the dimensions of the training data, and (2) the number of simulations used as training cases. Reducing data dimensions was found to diminish mean relative error in predictions of velocity and turbulent viscosity, while increasing it in predictions of pressure and angular velocity. Increasing the number of training cases from two to three was found to reduce relative error for all predicted unknowns. With the best achieved CNN model, the variables of x-velocity, y-velocity, pressure, turbulent viscosity, and angular velocity were inferred with mean relative errors of 6.93%, 9.82%, 10.7%, 7.48%, and 0.817%, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1130deep learningvertical-axis turbineturbine interactionarray optimizationURANSCFD
spellingShingle Chloë Dorge
Eric Louis Bibeau
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
Energies
deep learning
vertical-axis turbine
turbine interaction
array optimization
URANS
CFD
title Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
title_full Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
title_fullStr Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
title_short Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions for Vertical-Axis Turbines
title_sort deep learning based prediction of unsteady reynolds averaged navier stokes solutions for vertical axis turbines
topic deep learning
vertical-axis turbine
turbine interaction
array optimization
URANS
CFD
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1130
work_keys_str_mv AT chloedorge deeplearningbasedpredictionofunsteadyreynoldsaveragednavierstokessolutionsforverticalaxisturbines
AT ericlouisbibeau deeplearningbasedpredictionofunsteadyreynoldsaveragednavierstokessolutionsforverticalaxisturbines