Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management

Background Qualitative olfactory disorders in the form of parosmia and phantosmia are very subjective and cannot be measured at present. They pose an unpleasant experience for patients and a therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Objective This study aimed to characterise the specific experiences of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carl Philpott, Joanne Dixon, Duncan Boak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-09-01
Series:Allergy & Rhinology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21526567211004251
_version_ 1819132147426918400
author Carl Philpott
Joanne Dixon
Duncan Boak
author_facet Carl Philpott
Joanne Dixon
Duncan Boak
author_sort Carl Philpott
collection DOAJ
description Background Qualitative olfactory disorders in the form of parosmia and phantosmia are very subjective and cannot be measured at present. They pose an unpleasant experience for patients and a therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Objective This study aimed to characterise the specific experiences of patients affected by the qualitative symptoms of parosmia and phantosmia including both triggers for symptoms and self-help measures they have tried. Methods A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was developed with the input of patient experts within the charity Fifth Sense. The survey was then open online for 3 months to charity members complaining of qualitative symptoms. The survey captured the frequency and impact of symptoms and self-management undertaken. Reflective feedback was also captured from a patient workshop. Results There were 100 participants; 61% female, age range 13-88. Common self-reported aetiology included sinonasal disease (17%), idiopathic (33%) and post-viral olfactory loss (26%) and post-traumatic olfactory loss (23%). Parosmia was reported as a daily symptom in 67% compared to 31% for phantosmia; 36% complained of suffering with both symptoms. Only 4% of respondents reported having received any successful treatment for their qualitative symptoms and 58% reported having received no treatment whatsoever. Olfactory training was the most common self-management method reported. Conclusion This study illustrates that qualitative disturbances remain problematic for those who experience them due to the duration of symptoms, the relative lack of experience or knowledge amongst medical professionals and the lack of therapeutic options. In future, consideration needs to be given to adaptation and coping strategies to help patients deal with these symptoms.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T09:26:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c59592fed4ab41e6bd92d8412f7fa4ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2152-6567
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T09:26:47Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Allergy & Rhinology
spelling doaj.art-c59592fed4ab41e6bd92d8412f7fa4ec2022-12-21T18:31:03ZengSAGE PublishingAllergy & Rhinology2152-65672021-09-011210.1177/21526567211004251Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-ManagementCarl PhilpottJoanne DixonDuncan BoakBackground Qualitative olfactory disorders in the form of parosmia and phantosmia are very subjective and cannot be measured at present. They pose an unpleasant experience for patients and a therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Objective This study aimed to characterise the specific experiences of patients affected by the qualitative symptoms of parosmia and phantosmia including both triggers for symptoms and self-help measures they have tried. Methods A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was developed with the input of patient experts within the charity Fifth Sense. The survey was then open online for 3 months to charity members complaining of qualitative symptoms. The survey captured the frequency and impact of symptoms and self-management undertaken. Reflective feedback was also captured from a patient workshop. Results There were 100 participants; 61% female, age range 13-88. Common self-reported aetiology included sinonasal disease (17%), idiopathic (33%) and post-viral olfactory loss (26%) and post-traumatic olfactory loss (23%). Parosmia was reported as a daily symptom in 67% compared to 31% for phantosmia; 36% complained of suffering with both symptoms. Only 4% of respondents reported having received any successful treatment for their qualitative symptoms and 58% reported having received no treatment whatsoever. Olfactory training was the most common self-management method reported. Conclusion This study illustrates that qualitative disturbances remain problematic for those who experience them due to the duration of symptoms, the relative lack of experience or knowledge amongst medical professionals and the lack of therapeutic options. In future, consideration needs to be given to adaptation and coping strategies to help patients deal with these symptoms.https://doi.org/10.1177/21526567211004251
spellingShingle Carl Philpott
Joanne Dixon
Duncan Boak
Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
Allergy & Rhinology
title Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
title_full Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
title_fullStr Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
title_short Qualitative Olfactory Disorders: Patient Experiences and Self-Management
title_sort qualitative olfactory disorders patient experiences and self management
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21526567211004251
work_keys_str_mv AT carlphilpott qualitativeolfactorydisorderspatientexperiencesandselfmanagement
AT joannedixon qualitativeolfactorydisorderspatientexperiencesandselfmanagement
AT duncanboak qualitativeolfactorydisorderspatientexperiencesandselfmanagement