Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors.
Since 2013, the usage of preprints as a means of sharing research in biology has rapidly grown, in particular via the preprint server bioRxiv. Recent studies have found that journal articles that were previously posted to bioRxiv received a higher number of citations or mentions/shares on other onli...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274441 |
| _version_ | 1797984340269858816 |
|---|---|
| author | Nicholas Fraser Philipp Mayr Isabella Peters |
| author_facet | Nicholas Fraser Philipp Mayr Isabella Peters |
| author_sort | Nicholas Fraser |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Since 2013, the usage of preprints as a means of sharing research in biology has rapidly grown, in particular via the preprint server bioRxiv. Recent studies have found that journal articles that were previously posted to bioRxiv received a higher number of citations or mentions/shares on other online platforms compared to articles in the same journals that were not posted. However, the exact causal mechanism for this effect has not been established, and may in part be related to authors' biases in the selection of articles that are chosen to be posted as preprints. We aimed to investigate this mechanism by conducting a mixed-methods survey of 1,444 authors of bioRxiv preprints, to investigate the reasons that they post or do not post certain articles as preprints, and to make comparisons between articles they choose to post and not post as preprints. We find that authors are most strongly motivated to post preprints to increase awareness of their work and increase the speed of its dissemination; conversely, the strongest reasons for not posting preprints centre around a lack of awareness of preprints and reluctance to publicly post work that has not undergone a peer review process. We additionally find evidence that authors do not consider quality, novelty or significance when posting or not posting research as preprints, however, authors retain an expectation that articles they post as preprints will receive more citations or be shared more widely online than articles not posted. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:00:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c59f53c1558e430e8736f838a8f88039 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:00:29Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-c59f53c1558e430e8736f838a8f880392022-12-22T04:38:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027444110.1371/journal.pone.0274441Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors.Nicholas FraserPhilipp MayrIsabella PetersSince 2013, the usage of preprints as a means of sharing research in biology has rapidly grown, in particular via the preprint server bioRxiv. Recent studies have found that journal articles that were previously posted to bioRxiv received a higher number of citations or mentions/shares on other online platforms compared to articles in the same journals that were not posted. However, the exact causal mechanism for this effect has not been established, and may in part be related to authors' biases in the selection of articles that are chosen to be posted as preprints. We aimed to investigate this mechanism by conducting a mixed-methods survey of 1,444 authors of bioRxiv preprints, to investigate the reasons that they post or do not post certain articles as preprints, and to make comparisons between articles they choose to post and not post as preprints. We find that authors are most strongly motivated to post preprints to increase awareness of their work and increase the speed of its dissemination; conversely, the strongest reasons for not posting preprints centre around a lack of awareness of preprints and reluctance to publicly post work that has not undergone a peer review process. We additionally find evidence that authors do not consider quality, novelty or significance when posting or not posting research as preprints, however, authors retain an expectation that articles they post as preprints will receive more citations or be shared more widely online than articles not posted.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274441 |
| spellingShingle | Nicholas Fraser Philipp Mayr Isabella Peters Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. PLoS ONE |
| title | Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. |
| title_full | Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. |
| title_fullStr | Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. |
| title_short | Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors. |
| title_sort | motivations concerns and selection biases when posting preprints a survey of biorxiv authors |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274441 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicholasfraser motivationsconcernsandselectionbiaseswhenpostingpreprintsasurveyofbiorxivauthors AT philippmayr motivationsconcernsandselectionbiaseswhenpostingpreprintsasurveyofbiorxivauthors AT isabellapeters motivationsconcernsandselectionbiaseswhenpostingpreprintsasurveyofbiorxivauthors |