Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI
The monitoring and assessment of data quality is an essential step in the acquisition and analysis of functional MRI (fMRI) data. Ideally data quality monitoring is performed while the data are being acquired and the subject is still in the MRI scanner so that any errors can be caught early and addr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Neuroimaging |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1072927/full |
| _version_ | 1797884436703870976 |
|---|---|
| author | Rasmus M. Birn Rasmus M. Birn |
| author_facet | Rasmus M. Birn Rasmus M. Birn |
| author_sort | Rasmus M. Birn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The monitoring and assessment of data quality is an essential step in the acquisition and analysis of functional MRI (fMRI) data. Ideally data quality monitoring is performed while the data are being acquired and the subject is still in the MRI scanner so that any errors can be caught early and addressed. It is also important to perform data quality assessments at multiple points in the processing pipeline. This is particularly true when analyzing datasets with large numbers of subjects, coming from multiple investigators and/or institutions. These quality control procedures should monitor not only the quality of the original and processed data, but also the accuracy and consistency of acquisition parameters. Between-site differences in acquisition parameters can guide the choice of certain processing steps (e.g., resampling from oblique orientations, spatial smoothing). Various quality control metrics can determine what subjects to exclude from the group analyses, and can also guide additional processing steps that may be necessary. This paper describes a combination of qualitative and quantitative assessments to determine the quality of fMRI data. Processing is performed using the AFNI data analysis package. Qualitative assessments include visual inspection of the structural T1-weighted and fMRI echo-planar images, functional connectivity maps, functional connectivity strength, and temporal signal-to-noise maps concatenated from all subjects into a movie format. Quantitative metrics include the acquisition parameters, statistics about the level of subject motion, temporal signal-to-noise ratio, smoothness of the data, and the average functional connectivity strength. These measures are evaluated at different steps in the processing pipeline to catch gross abnormalities in the data, and to determine deviations in acquisition parameters, the alignment to template space, the level of head motion, and other sources of noise. We also evaluate the effect of different quantitative QC cutoffs, specifically the motion censoring threshold, and the impact of bandpass filtering. These qualitative and quantitative metrics can then provide information about what subjects to exclude and what subjects to examine more closely in the analysis of large datasets. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:07:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c5a62297b2284b9f8f00e95ab17c9d95 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2813-1193 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:07:39Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Neuroimaging |
| spelling | doaj.art-c5a62297b2284b9f8f00e95ab17c9d952023-03-13T04:37:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroimaging2813-11932023-03-01210.3389/fnimg.2023.10729271072927Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRIRasmus M. Birn0Rasmus M. Birn1Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesThe monitoring and assessment of data quality is an essential step in the acquisition and analysis of functional MRI (fMRI) data. Ideally data quality monitoring is performed while the data are being acquired and the subject is still in the MRI scanner so that any errors can be caught early and addressed. It is also important to perform data quality assessments at multiple points in the processing pipeline. This is particularly true when analyzing datasets with large numbers of subjects, coming from multiple investigators and/or institutions. These quality control procedures should monitor not only the quality of the original and processed data, but also the accuracy and consistency of acquisition parameters. Between-site differences in acquisition parameters can guide the choice of certain processing steps (e.g., resampling from oblique orientations, spatial smoothing). Various quality control metrics can determine what subjects to exclude from the group analyses, and can also guide additional processing steps that may be necessary. This paper describes a combination of qualitative and quantitative assessments to determine the quality of fMRI data. Processing is performed using the AFNI data analysis package. Qualitative assessments include visual inspection of the structural T1-weighted and fMRI echo-planar images, functional connectivity maps, functional connectivity strength, and temporal signal-to-noise maps concatenated from all subjects into a movie format. Quantitative metrics include the acquisition parameters, statistics about the level of subject motion, temporal signal-to-noise ratio, smoothness of the data, and the average functional connectivity strength. These measures are evaluated at different steps in the processing pipeline to catch gross abnormalities in the data, and to determine deviations in acquisition parameters, the alignment to template space, the level of head motion, and other sources of noise. We also evaluate the effect of different quantitative QC cutoffs, specifically the motion censoring threshold, and the impact of bandpass filtering. These qualitative and quantitative metrics can then provide information about what subjects to exclude and what subjects to examine more closely in the analysis of large datasets.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1072927/fullconnectivitymotionfMRIartifactsquality control |
| spellingShingle | Rasmus M. Birn Rasmus M. Birn Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI Frontiers in Neuroimaging connectivity motion fMRI artifacts quality control |
| title | Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI |
| title_full | Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI |
| title_fullStr | Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI |
| title_short | Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI |
| title_sort | quality control procedures and metrics for resting state functional mri |
| topic | connectivity motion fMRI artifacts quality control |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1072927/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmusmbirn qualitycontrolproceduresandmetricsforrestingstatefunctionalmri AT rasmusmbirn qualitycontrolproceduresandmetricsforrestingstatefunctionalmri |