Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification

Abstract Background The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach manageme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Dorevitch, Abhilasha Shrestha, Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker, Cathy Breitenbach, Ira Heimler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:Environmental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y
_version_ 1818893448265072640
author Samuel Dorevitch
Abhilasha Shrestha
Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker
Cathy Breitenbach
Ira Heimler
author_facet Samuel Dorevitch
Abhilasha Shrestha
Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker
Cathy Breitenbach
Ira Heimler
author_sort Samuel Dorevitch
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. Methods Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). Conclusions The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:12:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5a6da37e9d84fec8fd2dc25f2945eaf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-069X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:12:45Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Environmental Health
spelling doaj.art-c5a6da37e9d84fec8fd2dc25f2945eaf2022-12-21T20:11:16ZengBMCEnvironmental Health1476-069X2017-05-0116111010.1186/s12940-017-0256-yMonitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notificationSamuel Dorevitch0Abhilasha Shrestha1Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker2Cathy Breitenbach3Ira Heimler4Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public HealthDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public HealthDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public HealthChicago Park DistrictDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public HealthAbstract Background The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. Methods Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). Conclusions The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-ySurface water monitoringBeach managementFecal indicator bacteriaQuantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)Water pollution
spellingShingle Samuel Dorevitch
Abhilasha Shrestha
Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker
Cathy Breitenbach
Ira Heimler
Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
Environmental Health
Surface water monitoring
Beach management
Fecal indicator bacteria
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
Water pollution
title Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_full Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_fullStr Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_short Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_sort monitoring urban beaches with qpcr vs culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria implications for public notification
topic Surface water monitoring
Beach management
Fecal indicator bacteria
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
Water pollution
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y
work_keys_str_mv AT samueldorevitch monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT abhilashashrestha monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT stephaniedefloriobarker monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT cathybreitenbach monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT iraheimler monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification