Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm

<i>Background and objectives:</i> Renal stones are widespread, with a lifetime prevalence of 10% in adults. Flexible ureteroscopy enables urologists to treat lower calyx stones or even complex renal stones through the natural orifice and achieve an acceptable stone-free rate. Hence, we a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cozma Cosmin, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Geavlete, Razvan-Ionut Popescu, Bogdan Geavlete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/1/124
_version_ 1797438961119920128
author Cozma Cosmin
Dragos Adrian Georgescu
Petrisor Geavlete
Razvan-Ionut Popescu
Bogdan Geavlete
author_facet Cozma Cosmin
Dragos Adrian Georgescu
Petrisor Geavlete
Razvan-Ionut Popescu
Bogdan Geavlete
author_sort Cozma Cosmin
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and objectives:</i> Renal stones are widespread, with a lifetime prevalence of 10% in adults. Flexible ureteroscopy enables urologists to treat lower calyx stones or even complex renal stones through the natural orifice and achieve an acceptable stone-free rate. Hence, we analyzed the effectiveness and safety of FURS versus PCNL in treating renal stones between 20 and 40 mm in diameter. <i>Materials and methods:</i> We retrospectively analyzed 250 consecutive patients with large renal solitary stones (stone burden between 2 and 4 cm) from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (125 patients), in which the patients were treated by a retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach, and group 2 (125 patients), in which we used percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone characteristics and anatomical data were observed based on the computed tomography (CT) and/or KUB (Kidney-ureter-Bladder) radiography imaging archive. <i>Results:</i> The mean stone burden was 26.38 ± 4.453 mm in group 1 and 29.44 ± 4.817 mm in group 2. The stone-free rate after the first ureteroscopy was higher for the PNL(percutaneous nephrolithotomy) group (90.4%) than the F-URS group (68%). After two sessions of ureteroscopy, the SFR was 88.8% in the first group, and after three procedures, the SFR rose to 95.2%. The overall complication rate was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (18.4% vs. 16.8%), but without statistical relevance (<i>p</i> > 0.5). Furthermore, we encountered more grade III and IV complications in the PNL group (8.8% vs. 4.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusion:</i> Flexible ureteroscopy proves to be efficient in treating renal stones over 2 cm. However, the patients must be informed that more than one procedure might be necessary to overcome the entire stone burden.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:44:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5bfd44aaed14d85bfbc99460f60d484
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:44:50Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-c5bfd44aaed14d85bfbc99460f60d4842023-11-30T23:24:41ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442023-01-0159112410.3390/medicina59010124Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cmCozma Cosmin0Dragos Adrian Georgescu1Petrisor Geavlete2Razvan-Ionut Popescu3Bogdan Geavlete4Department of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania<i>Background and objectives:</i> Renal stones are widespread, with a lifetime prevalence of 10% in adults. Flexible ureteroscopy enables urologists to treat lower calyx stones or even complex renal stones through the natural orifice and achieve an acceptable stone-free rate. Hence, we analyzed the effectiveness and safety of FURS versus PCNL in treating renal stones between 20 and 40 mm in diameter. <i>Materials and methods:</i> We retrospectively analyzed 250 consecutive patients with large renal solitary stones (stone burden between 2 and 4 cm) from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (125 patients), in which the patients were treated by a retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach, and group 2 (125 patients), in which we used percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone characteristics and anatomical data were observed based on the computed tomography (CT) and/or KUB (Kidney-ureter-Bladder) radiography imaging archive. <i>Results:</i> The mean stone burden was 26.38 ± 4.453 mm in group 1 and 29.44 ± 4.817 mm in group 2. The stone-free rate after the first ureteroscopy was higher for the PNL(percutaneous nephrolithotomy) group (90.4%) than the F-URS group (68%). After two sessions of ureteroscopy, the SFR was 88.8% in the first group, and after three procedures, the SFR rose to 95.2%. The overall complication rate was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (18.4% vs. 16.8%), but without statistical relevance (<i>p</i> > 0.5). Furthermore, we encountered more grade III and IV complications in the PNL group (8.8% vs. 4.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusion:</i> Flexible ureteroscopy proves to be efficient in treating renal stones over 2 cm. However, the patients must be informed that more than one procedure might be necessary to overcome the entire stone burden.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/1/124flexible ureteroscopypercutaneous nephrolithitomyrenal lithiasis
spellingShingle Cozma Cosmin
Dragos Adrian Georgescu
Petrisor Geavlete
Razvan-Ionut Popescu
Bogdan Geavlete
Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
Medicina
flexible ureteroscopy
percutaneous nephrolithitomy
renal lithiasis
title Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
title_full Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
title_fullStr Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
title_short Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2–4 cm
title_sort comparison between retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones of 2 4 cm
topic flexible ureteroscopy
percutaneous nephrolithitomy
renal lithiasis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/1/124
work_keys_str_mv AT cozmacosmin comparisonbetweenretrogradeflexibleureteroscopyandpercutaneousnephrolithotomyforthetreatmentofrenalstonesof24cm
AT dragosadriangeorgescu comparisonbetweenretrogradeflexibleureteroscopyandpercutaneousnephrolithotomyforthetreatmentofrenalstonesof24cm
AT petrisorgeavlete comparisonbetweenretrogradeflexibleureteroscopyandpercutaneousnephrolithotomyforthetreatmentofrenalstonesof24cm
AT razvanionutpopescu comparisonbetweenretrogradeflexibleureteroscopyandpercutaneousnephrolithotomyforthetreatmentofrenalstonesof24cm
AT bogdangeavlete comparisonbetweenretrogradeflexibleureteroscopyandpercutaneousnephrolithotomyforthetreatmentofrenalstonesof24cm