The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab

Pesticides applications generate negative externalities for health, environment and also add up to economiccost to cotton producers. Consequently, there is an urgent need of alternative methods of pest management forenvironment friendly cotton production systems. Integrated pest management (IPM) is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul Saboor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Soil Science Society of Pakistan (SSSP) 2011-04-01
Series:Soil & Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.se.org.pk/File-Download.aspx?publishedid=25
_version_ 1819195692638273536
author Maqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul Saboor
author_facet Maqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul Saboor
author_sort Maqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul Saboor
collection DOAJ
description Pesticides applications generate negative externalities for health, environment and also add up to economiccost to cotton producers. Consequently, there is an urgent need of alternative methods of pest management forenvironment friendly cotton production systems. Integrated pest management (IPM) is a right method which canreduce or minimize the use of pesticides as well as can lessen the cost. The cross-sectional data was collected fromdistrict Jhang. A random sample of 99 farmers was selected to collect the data. The main factors which influencethe adoption of IPM in cotton are age, education, farm size, farm labour, family size, progressive farmers andopinion leader farmers. The logistic regression was used to estimate the model. Three variables are significant at 5percent level of significance and two variables are significant at 10 percent level of significance. The family size andopinion leader farmer (variables) are non-significant. The Hosmer Lemeshow test value was 0.316 (Chi-square)which was non-significant indicating that overall model was correctly specified. The estimated odds ratio foreducation, farm size, family labour, progressive farmer, and opinion leader farmer were 1.49, 1.07, 11.08, 12.26and 4.27, respectively. All these factors had positive influence on the adoption of IPM technology by the magnitudeof their respective odds ratio. However, the estimated odds ratio for family size was 0.48 and for age was 0.88(both the estimated coefficient have negative signs), which suggests a negative influence on the adoption of IPM.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T02:16:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c5c2840e3e124de480c68fa59051b4b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2074-9546
2075-1141
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T02:16:48Z
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher Soil Science Society of Pakistan (SSSP)
record_format Article
series Soil & Environment
spelling doaj.art-c5c2840e3e124de480c68fa59051b4b92022-12-21T18:03:39ZengSoil Science Society of Pakistan (SSSP)Soil & Environment2074-95462075-11412011-04-013017477The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the PunjabMaqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul SaboorPesticides applications generate negative externalities for health, environment and also add up to economiccost to cotton producers. Consequently, there is an urgent need of alternative methods of pest management forenvironment friendly cotton production systems. Integrated pest management (IPM) is a right method which canreduce or minimize the use of pesticides as well as can lessen the cost. The cross-sectional data was collected fromdistrict Jhang. A random sample of 99 farmers was selected to collect the data. The main factors which influencethe adoption of IPM in cotton are age, education, farm size, farm labour, family size, progressive farmers andopinion leader farmers. The logistic regression was used to estimate the model. Three variables are significant at 5percent level of significance and two variables are significant at 10 percent level of significance. The family size andopinion leader farmer (variables) are non-significant. The Hosmer Lemeshow test value was 0.316 (Chi-square)which was non-significant indicating that overall model was correctly specified. The estimated odds ratio foreducation, farm size, family labour, progressive farmer, and opinion leader farmer were 1.49, 1.07, 11.08, 12.26and 4.27, respectively. All these factors had positive influence on the adoption of IPM technology by the magnitudeof their respective odds ratio. However, the estimated odds ratio for family size was 0.48 and for age was 0.88(both the estimated coefficient have negative signs), which suggests a negative influence on the adoption of IPM.http://www.se.org.pk/File-Download.aspx?publishedid=25IPMcottonlogit regressionadoptionpesticidesPunjab
spellingShingle Maqsood Hussain*, Sarwat Zia and Abdul Saboor
The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
Soil & Environment
IPM
cotton
logit regression
adoption
pesticides
Punjab
title The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
title_full The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
title_fullStr The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
title_full_unstemmed The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
title_short The adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) technologies by cotton growers in the Punjab
title_sort adoption of integrated pest management ipm technologies by cotton growers in the punjab
topic IPM
cotton
logit regression
adoption
pesticides
Punjab
url http://www.se.org.pk/File-Download.aspx?publishedid=25
work_keys_str_mv AT maqsoodhussainsarwatziaandabdulsaboor theadoptionofintegratedpestmanagementipmtechnologiesbycottongrowersinthepunjab
AT maqsoodhussainsarwatziaandabdulsaboor adoptionofintegratedpestmanagementipmtechnologiesbycottongrowersinthepunjab